The graph below plots the PIPS July 7 ice thickness distribution for 2008 and 2011. 2008 had more ice area, but the ice was much thinner. As a result, a lot of ice melted in August and September. That is less likely to happen in 2011 because the ice is thicker and located at higher latitudes.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
Recent Comments
- arn on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- conrad ziefle on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Ulric Lyons on Erasing 1921
- gordon vigurs on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- gordon vigurs on Plant Food
- gordon vigurs on Plant Food
- gordon vigurs on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- arn on UK Net Zero
- conrad ziefle on UK Net Zero
- czechlist on UK Net Zero
That huge, thick chunk of ice is melting very slowly. We will probably be quite pleased with the September numbers. In six weeks or so, we should know the story.
How do those plots compare with 2010?
-Scott
2010 was similar to 2011, but 2010 had a lot of thick ice near 70N latitude in Siberia. This year the thick ice is north of 75N and is less likely to melt.