It appears that most climate scientists don’t know jack about anything, and are largely a bunch of mindless blowhards in search of parasitic funding.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Gordon Vigurs on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
Funding and Fame . . . All those getting interviews on local and national TV, the flattery in the press, the moral superiority that can be sold to gullible advertisers and funders.
AGW, more proof that people will say anything for a buck.
Yeh, that about sums it up.
That’s a little harsh but it’s true a small group of ‘media whores’ have ruined the field. I don’t have a problem with scientists knowing little about a particular research field. The problem is the pretension to know things they don’t actually know.
Climate scientists have learned lots:
They have become expert charlatans.
Redefined the meaning of quackery.
Created a road map for the biggest white collar heist in history.
Given astrology a modern day revival.
The purveyors of doom.
You forgot to mention the sycophant thingy….and the lemming thingy….. and the turnip thingy…. There are probably a few more “thingy’s” we could all bring up about these money sucking vampires; but I’m tired. It’s cold outside and I want to get under a warm blanket to shield me from the global warming that’s threatening to fry me like an egg. Going to bed.
To take a muddled up mess of data, then introduce enough money to last a lifetime, (with a lab and its staff).
Might lead some, to ….the bias that pays.
i.e. politics.
Here in Australia today, a puffed up newspaper climate commentator now reckons climate skepticism is the same as agreeing that paedophelia is a good thing!!!
And they wonder why we reckon they are raving lunatics and dumber than turnips!
If it feels good, do it!
I have been saying for two years that there are no competent climate scientists. The trouble now is, there is no competent public oversight or control of them. I see no way for it to end, other than real, violent war–it is already, now, a war of suppression of those of us who know enough to be truthfully disdainful of the incompetent “consensus”. The Insane Left has the bit in its teeth, its eyes are wide open and bulging, and its mouth is foaming. The words, “They know not what they do” come to mind.
Then you MUST publish this for the few who do not know 😉
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlXAbi7RSBU
The above was at the IPCC at Qatar of all places. Lots of 7* hotels, (all air-con), first class flights from all over the world and the finest food the taxpayer can buy.
You forgot “leftist”.
The left does with climate science what they do with gun control. They single out one possible component that they do not like, and assign full weight to it, while ignoring all other factors.
That one component is themselves.
“It appears that most climate scientists don’t know jack about anything, and are largely a bunch of mindless blowhards in search of parasitic funding.”
You had doubts about that? It should have been obvious from the get go if given at least 12 seconds of rational thought. Was it not obvious, then as now, that if catastrophic runaway global warming hadn’t happened in the past 3.5 billion years, it is NOT going to happen in the next 100. Especially not because of what we puny humans do to the earth? All the rest of the other climate stuff we talk about is, by comparison, just making sure the decimal points are in the right place and all the words are spelled correctly. Unfortunately, the painfully obvious is about the last thing that is either seen, understood, or accepted.
It was never about science, the climate, nor the environment, it was about whatever they could get away with.
What We Have Learned About Climate Science?
1. It’s settled.
2. 97% of all scientists agree.
Surely that right? eh?