Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Jehzsa on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Greg in NZ on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Trevor on “records going back to 1961”
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Climate Scamming For Profit
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
Steven, I find this graph interesting, but I am not able to find the data at the source indicated, so I am uncomfortable with it.
http://c3headlines.typepad.com/.a/6a010536b58035970c0168e55964fe970c-pi
I like that it is using actual records of Tmax and Tmin rather than Tmean or anomalies. If valid, it appears to show that what little warming has occurred is mostly due to higher minimums.
It seems to me that only hotter maximums can serve as a basis for alarm; milder overnights, and warmer and shorter winters can only be a good thing for humankind.