Leading climate experts have been telling us for years that snow coverage is declining due to global warming. This can be seen in the graph below, with 2012 finishing the year at a record 900,000 Manhattans of snow in the Northern Hemisphere.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Mike Peinsipp on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Robertvd on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- arn on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis


Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
ya…but just wait…we will have ONE year below normal…and this will be the new norm….(shaking head again…)
Steve, Your linking to the wrong data, it looks like 1972 was higher.
http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/table_area.php?ui_set=0
“Satellite Era”
Ahh, thanks for clearing the up!
According to the table you have linked:
Northern Hemisphere snow extent – Week 52
2012 50.51 million square km
1972 43.03 million square km
Have I read the table incorrectly or have you?
BTW – its ‘you’re’ not ‘your’ 🙂
Yes, I was reading the wrong table, Steve cleared that up for me. 🙂
I know, I spotted that typo too, I spot my typos after I post most of the time, word press doesn’t have an edit feature 🙁
I think Steve edits my comments to add typo’s /jk
Ok, alarmists all together now: “but, but, but.. the spring snow.. the spring snoooooooow!!”