Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
WWF 2000 : Greenhouse Gases To Evaporate America
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Along with a tenuous grasp of the facts, these people often seem to write as if English was a second language.
Looks like Richard was an infrequent “guest” in his english classes…
If GHGs and clouds account for 83 % of the radiation emitted to space as the IPCC using Kiehl & Trenberth et al claim it is actually difficult to see them as being responsible for global warming – they account for 83% of the cooling.
Allegedly 99 % of the atmosphere is essentially transparent to IR radiation and according to many cannot radiate IR.
Given that the atmosphere actually heats up – I think thermometers prove this but I could be wrong – and 99% cannot radiate IR to space to cool then I suggest this is a very strong argument that non-GHGs are responsible for global warming/climate change.
I only quote peer reviewed science !