Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- arn on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- Bob G on CO2²
- Bob G on CO2²
- conrad ziefle on CO2²
- arn on CO2²
WWF 2000 : Greenhouse Gases To Evaporate America
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Along with a tenuous grasp of the facts, these people often seem to write as if English was a second language.
Looks like Richard was an infrequent “guest” in his english classes…
If GHGs and clouds account for 83 % of the radiation emitted to space as the IPCC using Kiehl & Trenberth et al claim it is actually difficult to see them as being responsible for global warming – they account for 83% of the cooling.
Allegedly 99 % of the atmosphere is essentially transparent to IR radiation and according to many cannot radiate IR.
Given that the atmosphere actually heats up – I think thermometers prove this but I could be wrong – and 99% cannot radiate IR to space to cool then I suggest this is a very strong argument that non-GHGs are responsible for global warming/climate change.
I only quote peer reviewed science !