Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
Recent Comments
- Bob G on On The Road Again
- Bob G on On The Road Again
- Gordon Vigurs on On The Road Again
- Bob G on On The Road Again
- Bob G on On The Road Again
- Bob G on On The Road Again
- Gordon Vigurs on On The Road Again
- Bob G on On The Road Again
- Bob G on On The Road Again
- Bob G on Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
WWF 2000 : Greenhouse Gases To Evaporate America
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Along with a tenuous grasp of the facts, these people often seem to write as if English was a second language.
Looks like Richard was an infrequent “guest” in his english classes…
If GHGs and clouds account for 83 % of the radiation emitted to space as the IPCC using Kiehl & Trenberth et al claim it is actually difficult to see them as being responsible for global warming – they account for 83% of the cooling.
Allegedly 99 % of the atmosphere is essentially transparent to IR radiation and according to many cannot radiate IR.
Given that the atmosphere actually heats up – I think thermometers prove this but I could be wrong – and 99% cannot radiate IR to space to cool then I suggest this is a very strong argument that non-GHGs are responsible for global warming/climate change.
I only quote peer reviewed science !