Alarmists start many of their graphs close to 1979.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Bob G on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- arn on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- william on Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- conrad ziefle on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
Propaganda artists were well paid to “cherry pick” data after the end of the Second World War, when frightened world leaders:
1. Formed the UN on 24 Oct 1945
2. Hid information about Japan’s atomic bomb production in Konan, Korea and the capture of that facility by the USSR shortly after its first A-bomb test on 12 August 1945
3. Hid knowledge of “powers beyond the dreams of scientific fiction” [1] in cores of
_ a.) Heavy atoms like U & Pu
_ b.) Some planets like Jupiter
_ c.) Ordinary stars like the Sun
_ d.) Galaxies like the Milky Way
To understand how “cherry picking” has put the survival of mankind at risk, study the last paragraph of F. W. Aston’s 1922 Nobel Prize lecture [1], P. K. Kuroda’s 1982 book on “The Origin of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo Phenomenon” [2], and Chapter 2 of my biography [3].
References:
1. F. W. Aston, “Mass spectra and isotopes,” Nobel Lecture (12 Dec 1922), last paragraph:
“Should the research worker of the future discover some means of releasing this energy in a form which could be employed, the human race will have at its command powers beyond the dreams of scientific fiction; but the remote possibility must always be considered that the energy once liberated will be completely uncontrollable and by its intense violence detonate all neighbouring substances. In this event the whole of the hydrogen on the earth might be transformed at once and the success of the experiment published at large to the universe as a new star.” http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1922/astonlecture.pdf
2. P. K. Kuroda, The Origin of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo Phenomenon (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982) 165 pages:
http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Chemical-Elements-Oklo-Phenomenon/dp/3642686699
3. O. K. Manuel, A Journey to the Core of the Sun – Chapter 2: Acceptance of Reality
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf
Thread bomber.
….is this the result of global warming, global cooling, or climate change…..?
No, it was just chance that satellites became available after 3 years of falling winter temperatures and in the year that all the Great Lakes froze over. 🙂
Weather satellites have been available since the late 1960s, it’s just that, since they don’t show a continuous warming trend, the data from them is considered “suspicious” and “low quality”.
Time for some data excavation, methinks.
Not only NSIDC, but DMI graphs as well. I would love the see the average ±1SD of the Arctic Ice Extent if the 1979 outlier were removed. Note, too, that 1979 was the culmination of three years downward temperature trend running. Start from 1980, and I would bet that the Arctic Ice Extent average ±1SD would not only look very different, but that today’s values would lie well within the limits of those data.
And….. as we have all seen here, fraudulent “adjustments” account for all warming. Why should the ice extent be any different? How many times has the extent approached the mean only to jump away suddenly? At least a few I can remember.
Steve,
Mind fisking this one?
http://azstarnet.com/news/blogs/desertblog/tucson-had-warmest-winter-on-record-weather-service-says/article_56597402-a2e8-11e3-82d1-0019bb2963f4.html
Tuscon is, of course, (in)famous for the weather-station-in-a-car-park at the esteemed climate department of the University of Arizona, headed up by the excreable Jonathan Overpeck.
http://gallery.surfacestations.org/main.php?g2_itemId=1606
[I believe they have moved it now.]
The operative phrase here is “according to the National Weather Service.” I would be suspicious of any such statement from that organization even if it supplied the correct data to prove it.
Anto,
It’s been a warm, wonderful Arizona winter. I haven’t been saying much about it since so much of the rest of the country has been hammered by bad weather – I didn’t want to seem like I was gloating!
As far as climate change – it doesn’t mean squat. Some winters are like this one: absolutely gorgeous! I rained just yesterday, so the wildflowers will be spectacular this year, but even before the rains, wildflowers have already been spontaneously sprouting all over my property.
Last year we had cold snaps that killed everyone’s ornamental landscaping plants – nothing like it this year. Maybe the coming summer will be super hot. That would be fun. It has been a long time since we had a really, really hot summer. Climate. Always a surprise.
But so far it has been freaking phenomenally beautiful in Southern Arizona this season.
Gloat away! Puncture the narratives, hole them below the water line.
Climate Drones have taken over the BOM and CSIRO in Australia.
Publishing more rubbish in the lead up to the carbon tax repeal.
http://mobile.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/bom-csiro-make-dire-climate-predictions/story-e6frfku9-1226844241944
I expect Andrew Bolt will republish his article from 2012.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/the_csiro_and_bureau_shame_themselves/
This gem was in the comment section:
“Is it (CAGW) falsifiable? Just tell us what observation would contradict the theory.” – Rendle.
We will never get the answer to this question because CAGW is a religion and not science. Observations that falsify the CAGW theory:
Great Lakes freeze up 2014
Record Scotland snowfall 2014
Record Antarctic sea ice extent 2013/14
Lowest hurricane / tornado frequency
Zero acceleration in sea level change
17 years of steady global temperatures
Rapid increase in global CAGW propaganda!
And here is what CSIRO does to those who disagree with the religion.
http://safetyatworkblog.com/2013/08/18/csiro-bullying-case-shows-the-complexity-of-the-issue-for-all-of-us/
We had lots of satellites in the 1960’s. There is no valid reason to start your chart at 1979, except for accentuating warming from a very cold period.
That’s an interesting assertion, which I’ve heard from several people. What changes, precisely, occurred in 1979 to make the previously unreliable satellites suddenly reliable?
Okay, that was supposed to be to Karl, below.
WordPress, you are a fucked-up disaster.
We had satellites, but the technology was in its infant stage. Be that as it may, the reliable satellite records start coincidentally at the bottom of the trough in the last cool cycle.
Data Warmists could rely on, you mean? Riiiiiggghhtt.