NASA forgot to mention in their recent WAIS collapse fraud press release, that it has nothing to do with CO2, and there is nothing we can do to stop it.
The WAIS was rapidly melting when CO2 was 310 PPM.
But the NASA fraud is much worse than it seems. The Ross Ice Shelf in West Antarctica retreated 30 miles from 1840 to 1930, about five feet per day. The retreat “may have been going on for centuries”
That doesn’t support your accusation of fraud, Steven. Newspaper articles aren’t science either.
[SG: Martin is using the identical argument which Holocaust deniers use – denying the written historical record]
Poor Martin….. DENY history all you want.
You really are a DENIER, aren’t you, little child.
How dare you compare Martin to a little child !!
what have you got against children ??
Not presenting all the facts, particularly that there is absolutely nothing untoward happening with the climate, the Arctic, Greenland, sea level, glaciers or anything to do with climate… while making unjustified changes to data to suit ‘the scam’…..
with the ABSOLUTE INTENT to CON the public for financial and/or political gain…,
…… That is FRAUD.
Only the most base level ignorant twit would not see otherwise.
“That doesn’t support your accusation of fraud”
What?! Of course it supports it. Taken by itself, it doesn’t PROVE it — but it certainly supports it.
There is a quote going around which I paraphrase: “Once an honest man has been shown his error, he either stops being in error, or he stops being honest.” The CAGW enthusiasts (I used to say “supporters” but I think “enthusiasts” is more accurate) claim that the current climate is both unprecedented and man made. The article from 1948 is evidence (not by itself proof) that current climate indicators are not unprecedented. The CAGW crowd has been shown to be wrong so many times that their clinging to error has passed into the “no longer honest” phase.
Fraud, anyone? Looks like it…
Martin Smith says:Newspaper articles aren’t science either.
Newspapers are a historical record. One which BTW is far more accurate in the information it imparts than say the governments temperature records. The newspaper clips have not been altered as the temperature record has.
The very fact that you object to having the historical record presented which clearly shows how NASA and NOAA have done a 180 degree turn about on important aspects of the climate record should make it clear your interested others knowing the facts And those which object to facts being presented obviously don’t give a damn about science or don’t know what it is in the first place.
First post again, well well.
What a truly pathetic, mendacious little stalker you are!
They distort and lie, and commit Fraud to support a Political Agenda..