Britain Tries To Tell The US Where We Can Put Our Embassy

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.

– Winston Churchill

Theresa May hoped to appease London based terrorists by voting against the US.  A clear message that terrorism works, and that Islam now calls the shots in the UK.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to Britain Tries To Tell The US Where We Can Put Our Embassy

  1. Kris Johanson says:

    Moving an embassy has sure created a lot of hostility

  2. Britain is just saying it wasn’t a good idea given the background politics.
    The US is entitled to a different view and to act accordingly if it wishes.
    I don’t think we want our colonies back anytime soon :)

    • tonyheller says:

      The UN Middle East Peace Process has been going on for 75 years, and has made exactly zero progress.

    • Ernest Bush says:

      The background politics is that there has been an increase in attempts to murder Israeli citizens followed by an Israeli attempt to clean out some rats. The UN’s answer to this has been to always support the slaughter of Israeli citizens and the destruction of the Israeli state.

      The definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over expecting a different result. Instead, our president carried out the will of our citizens which was put on the desk of a President back in 1995. President Trump was the first to listen and sign the legally binding recognition of Jerusalem as being the capital of Israel. We don’t much care about what the rest of the world thinks. A very large percent of Americans would like to see the UN moved out of the U.S. The land it squats on could be used to put a lot of Americans to work.

    • neal s says:

      The UN has typically acted to de-legitimize Israel and to give cover to those who wish to eliminate the nation of Israel and kill all Jews.

      I hope that in time (before PDJT leaves office) that no more of my tax dollars will go to any who do not share conservative values and none to those who would oppose Israel. It would also be nice if all government funding for fraudulent so-called ‘science’ were cut off. (CAGW being one of the biggest offenders)

    • TRM says:

      Wrong. That was Obama flipping the bird to AIPAC/Israel for fixing the election for Trump. He knew that his legacy would be undone by Trump. He was probably informed by the intelligence groups that the Democrat fixers got beat at their own game by the Israelis but couldn’t say anything because it was Israel. At least that is my theory.

      Play investigative journalist with me for a minute (hey we might as well, since the “real” journalists aren’t).

      Qui Bono? Well out of all the ownership groups in the USA I would say Israel has done the best. The bankers always get their picks for Treasury sec & Fed positions so they win either way. MIC? Sure Trump has sold a bunch and given them a $50 billion budget increase but Hillary never met a war she didn’t like. So both the bankers and MIC are a wash. Russia? Don’t make me laugh. Nothing beneficial to Russia has happened. NATO increases its encroachment in eastern Europe, more sanctions, etc.

      Motive? Israel wants war with Iran via Saudi Arabia the USA and or other proxies. Hillary wasn’t going to put the sanctions back on as she said so.

      Means? Oh yea Israel has some excellent cyber types. Easily. Just ask the stuxnet victims.

      Opportunity? Well everyone has the opportunity because the voting systems are made to be insecure. Just watch the youtube videos of the programmers testimony under oath before congress or visit (Bev Harris’ site).

      • Texas sharp-shooter says:

        Just wow. The guy who sold you on using the aluminum collander hat instead of the lead lined football helmet that was working so well up until now was probably a Jew secret agent trying to totally discredit you. You’ll probably never even notice.

        Sperm count? Fluoride in the water. Greatest minds of our time turned to scheise. It’s all a plot but hold fast. Hold fast!

        • TRM says:

          So where is the flaw in my reasoning?
          Keep in mind two things. First I don’t claim to be correct just having fun with stuff. Second is that you call people names when you have nothing intelligent to say.

  3. A C Osborn says:

    Tony, I apologise for my Government and in particular Mrs May.
    They are selling the UK down the river and at the same time doing their best to piss of President Trump and the US.
    I just wish we had a leader who actually did what he says he will as yours does.

    • stpaulchuck says:

      I have been reading with a heavy heart the last couple decades as the British government keeps slashing itself with the Death Of A Thousand Cuts. I mean what country would actually pass a law that will imprison you for defending yourself of your family from violent attack?

      As for the head bumpers, we’ve been doing our darnedest to follow Europe down the drain of forgotten Christianity and freedom of religion in favor of importing massive numbers of invaders. *shakes head*

  4. TA says:

    I was listening to former UN Ambassador Bolton right before the UN vote took place and he estimated that there would be about 180 nations voting against the United States move, but when the vote came about there were only 128 who voted against the U.S., while nine voted in favor and 35 nations abstained, including Canada, Mexico and Australia. I believe another 21 nations didn’t even show up to take this vote. So in total, about 65 nations supported Trump’s decision by either voting in favor or abstaining or hiding.

    I would say that’s a little bit of progress for Trump.

    Trump should retaliate against the 128 who voted against him by pulling the U.S. out of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and should reexamine all payments being made by the United States to the UN.

  5. The Middle East had been a bastion of peace for hundreds, nay, thousands of years before Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. What was he thinking? #sarcasm

  6. Jimmy Haigh says:

    Clinton, the Bushes and Obummer all said they’d move the embassy but didn’t do it. I guess they just wanted the votes.

  7. TRM says:

    “A clear message that terrorism works, and that Islam now calls the shots in the UK”
    and / or
    “A clear message that money works and that AIPAC/Israel now call the shots in the USA and have for quite a long time”


  8. Extreme Hiatus says:

    On the bright side, according to the UN’s chosen experts their New York HQ will soon be flooded by the rising sea.

  9. LOL in Oregon says:

    ..”Peace for our time, let them have the Sudentenland!”

  10. Mark Green says:

    I dont understand this post at all??

    In what way is TM being under the influence of terrorists exactly?

    The current location at Grosvenor square is a security nightmare, it was never intended to be secure against current threats and is very open in this respect.

    A new purpose built facility seems sensible, but Google doesn’t provide information how TM may not be helping this??

  11. CheshireRed says:

    It doesn’t matter what Israel or the US do, anything and everything causes Muslims to take manufactured offence and as we see here Islam goes on yet another Jew-baiting opportunity. It’s been this way for centuries past and it’ll be like this for centuries to come.
    As for Theresa May, her capitulation to the EU is in full swing as much as she’s in thrall to Muslims and Islam. Pathetic isn’t the word. She (and the UK) will need all the economic and political goodwill support going for a post-Brexit UK, so what does she do? Only go and insult president Trump and alienate our biggest ally. She has the political nous of a carrot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *