Climate Science : The Fact-Free Branch Of Science

We see claims like this from climate scientists and journalists every day.

Global-warming trends already hitting New York | Local News |

The claims in the article are completely fake and have no basis in science. The exact opposite is true. The frequency of hot days in New York state plummeted 60 years ago, and never recovered.

Many climate scientists, politicians and journalists believe they can lie with impunity. It is time to cut off all funding to these slime balls.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Climate Science : The Fact-Free Branch Of Science

  1. RAH says:

    Par for the course. Global warming and less snow would be an excellent thing for NYC based on this for a few years ago.

    • AndyG55 says:

      And their LIES and DECEIT just keep on coming.

      That hack job Lewindopey and Mann et al tried on Susan Crockford has to be one of the most disgusting pieces of anti-science I have ever seen.

  2. AndyG55 says:

    TH, typo to correct…

    Just above graph.. should be “exact”

  3. gregole says:

    Noise around zero. What crisis?

  4. tom0mason says:

    OT but of interest for people who like to trawl through old documentation…

    From the UNESCO Courier archives —

    Some early documents from the UN’s UNESCO Courier and it’s anti-science attitude — UNESCO Courier 1973 ‘Only One Earth’ with Limits to Growth included. UNESCO Courier 1969 ‘Can We Keep Our Planet Habitable’ with ‘Blueprint for Planetary Management’ and ‘Man Against Nature’ UNESCO Courier 1982 ‘Questions of Our Time’ for more Malthusian theories on reducing population in the article ‘Hunger — Population — Environment’. UNESCO Courier 1974 ‘Gypsies:A Minority at the Crossroads’, has a real interesting article on ‘The Establishment New International Economic Order’. UNESCO Courier 1974 ‘Power From The Sun and Other World Energy Sources’. Yes we’re all running out of energy special edition. Also of note sunbathing is harmful.

    I’m sure they have a reference to global cooling but I have yet to find it. Maybe others would like to assist in tracking them down….

  5. Matt Klein says:

    Can you post similar graphs for cold temps like percent of days below 32? Thanks for you r work!

  6. arn says:

    A science that is just based on journalists and politicians crying out loud
    and experts with a perfect track tecord of failed predictions
    is no science but a fascist dogma.

  7. Another Jim says:

    I second Matt Klein, days below 32F would be intersting.

  8. Johnny Von Neumann ruled out all possibility of mathematical modeling of climate back in the fifties (See Turing’s Cathedral). Nothing in chaos theory has to my understanding altered that picture, but rather, made it even clearer. For a number of ideological successors of Klaus Fuchs to have infiltrated unproductive bureaucracies as a fifth column using tax revenue to transform These States into what we now see all too vividly in Puerto Rico is anything BUT science.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.