Sea level rise rates peaked in Florida around 1935, with CO2 below 310 PPM. Apparently the only way to save Florida is to make sure CO2 levels never get that low again.
Sea Level Trends – Variation of 50-year Mean Sea Level Trends
Fear of sea level rise is already affecting Florida’s economy. You can now pick up an apartment in Miami for only $65 million.
What a shame ! Is this a fire-sale ?
Too funny….I was just having this same conversation with a loon in Florida on Citydata….I’ll post this link
John and Linda Landau…Titanic, Avatar, etc….just bought a house right on the ocean not too far from us…..it don’t get no more global warming liberal than John
My mother’s local paper, the Gainesville Sun, just ran another Chicken (of the seas) Little feature article about sea level rise…
Federal scientists say seas in parts of Florida have risen at a rate of about a third of an inch a year over the past decade. Mid-range forecasts from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration indicate seas could rise anywhere from 13 to 39 inches in Florida by 2070 and as much as 72 inches by 2100.
http://www.gainesville.com/news/20180107/coastal-waters-threaten-floridas-historic-resources
Floridians are bombarded with this crap nonstop.
You would think that if there serious sea level rise along the Florida coast that long term residents would have noticed it and would have left by now.
Further south a few miles in Mayport, the sea level is higher because it sits at the end of the St. John’s River — the final stop of enormous paved metro sprawl
areas of the Orlando-to-Jacksonville stormwater runoffs.
Fernandina doesn’t get that runoff. It sits downstream from the Okefenokee Swamp and St. Mary’s River. There’s no urban sprawl upstream from there.
These expensive houses were issued building permits by these cities, insurance companies happily insured them, and lenders tripped over themselves to hand out 30-year money – so don’t sue the oil companies for ‘concealing’ something decades ago
True, but some insurance companies may just as happily join the lawsuits.
On the other hand, the climate experts of other insurers determined their portfolios are not exposed to the coming collapse of Arctic agriculture or the depopulation of Thule, Barrow and Murmansk due to catastrophic global warming.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/global-warming-no-hoax-to-insurance-companies-2011-09-09
hmmm…