Tolerance means : “Shouting down anyone who rejects your global warming scam.”

A Science Denier at the Natural History Museum? Scientists Rebel. – The New York Times

The left never changes.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to #ToleranceMeans

  1. Robertv says:

    Yep, It was NEVER about climate.

    • arn says:

      It is and was about controle and indoctrination.

      Using uncriticizable groups/truths as muslims,blacks,climate etc
      and pulling artificial words out of their butts climate deniers,islamophobia((which is as ‘unjustified’ as Naziphobia,not just because they were best buddies in ww2 and admire each other)).

      All this is result of the critical theory of the frankfurt school which is 100% racist as this critical thinking is only pointed to one specific and as soon as you try to use this you’ll be called racist by the drones of the frankfurt schools.

      In general these people use minority groups which are declared uncriticizable by decree and ignoranz is a must.

      btw-isn’t it strange that 90% of those female activists look like Ernest Borgnine?
      One may think that their real motivation is revenge based on the fact that they had never been treated as women by men(one has to be very progressive to touch them on purpose) and therefore they try to turn the whole world into the same uglyness their faces are.

      • Robertv says:

        The Lindsay Shepherd Affair


        Dr Tim Ball must have a very difficult time in a country like Canada. I think the jews in Hitler germany also discovered too late how their country had changed in a sh.t hole. There must have been a lot that would not accept the truth even on their way to Auschwitz.

  2. Pathway says:

    After the Civil War the Democrat party did not regain the Whitehouse until 1885 because they were considered to be the party of treason.

    • neal s says:

      I would not be too surprised if in the near future, the dems would once again be considered the party of treason. Many of them have given enough cause. Wouldn’t bother me a bit if they did not return to the Whitehouse until 2085, or even never.

      • RAH says:

        After the last election results were in Rush Limbaugh was pointing out that the democrats are really now a regional party and not a national one. If they do not make substantial gains during the elections in the coming midterm elections or can’t succeed in their attempt to oust Trump, I will agree with him.

        • feathers says:

          I hate to say this but if the Dems are simply a regional party then Virginia is certainly within their region. I’m actually pretty worried about the mid-terms. I think most of us on Tony’s blog are a very minor segment of the electorate and the power of the MSM has worn down most non-political types to the point that they either believe them or have made the mental calculation that its not worth it to resist.

          Its not just fake news – fake news would be too easy to defeat. Its the all-out democratic propaganda combined with (just as critical) which stories, often important stories, get zero coverage. The best way to combat fake news is with more news choices but most still do the MSM thing (CNN, NYT, WaPo) and FaceBook feeds.

          Oh yeah, and this is how FaceBook is going to scrutinize conservative news outlets: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/facebook-change-conservative-sites-appear-newsfeed-heres-fix/

        • Robertv says:

          Both parties have been taken over by the progressives. That’s why Trump has so many problems. He is not fighting democrats he is fighting the republicans on the federal reserve’s pay list.

          • feathers says:

            The all out hatred has blinded the MSM and its supporters to the point that they are delusional! Trust me, I was depressed when coping with the prospect of a Clinton presidency, but if the stock market was at 26,600, new jobs (manufacturing jobs) were coming back, business optimism was high, and unemployment (especially among African Americans) was going down…I honestly believe I’d be able to say good for her and I’m sincerely happy for our country. These people do not think this way and categorically want our nation to fail (BIG TIME) right now – you cannot get more un-American than that. I’d never vote for people who think this way!

    • Psalmon says:

      If Trump Amnesty’s over 2 million DACAs, the GOP will not regain the White House in ONE HUNDRED years…if that.

      • RAH says:

        It ain’t gonna happen.

      • Rud Istvan says:

        The proposal is not amnesty. It is to grant a stay of deportation IF they keep their nose clean (no convictions for anything), provably stay in school, the military, or the workforce, no welfare, and speak minimally competent English (which about 46% do NOT). Meet all those requrements and you get a green card after 5 years. Then, if still clean, can apply for naturalization after another five years under present green card law. Only seems fair for kids brought here illegally by their parents, who know no other country, and did not themselves intentionally commit illegal entry. Removing chain migration as another part of the same deal also means the parents who commited the illegality still get deported. And funding the wall means there is no large repeat problem with new illegals.
        Trump’s strategic masterstroke here is checkmating the Democrats. They agree to this deal outline, he wins and solves a big humanitarian problem they did not even when could have in the early Obama years. They disagree, he deports all the DACAs like you apparently want.
        The new poll I read says ~70% of Americans support this middle way. So this will play well for Trump in this years midterms.

  3. RAH says:

    LOL! My initial page when I sign on has news controlled by MSNBC. I leave it that way because I like to see what the loony left is saying. All day today the “story” that has dominated more than any other is from the WaPo about the new refrigeration unit on Air Force One costing $24 million dollars. Pathetic.

    • R. Shearer says:

      The question is, at the intersection of the echo chambers, do the noises cancel or is the voice of reason heard?

  4. gator69 says:

    Love the museum’s response to The New York Times…

    The museum deeply respects the work and views of scientists — both those who work as colleagues at the museum and those from the broader scientific community. We also respect and understand scientists’ role in society, including adding their voices to political debates that relate to scientific issues. The museum itself, however, does not make appointment decisions concerning staff or trustees based on political views.

  5. RAH says:

    BTW, if I believe no conservative should ever give or loan the Guggheim anything ever again.


    And they claim Trump doesn’t have any class?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.