Climate Fraud Advancing At An Eye Opening Pace

Last March, the early Spring was an “eye-opening tangible sign of global warming.”

Spring advancing at an ‘eye-opening’ pace in tangible sign of global warming | The Independent

This year, the late Spring is also due to global warming.

UK weather: Heavy snow could cover Britain on Easter as the Beast from the East 3 strikes | Weather | News |

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Climate Fraud Advancing At An Eye Opening Pace

  1. Griff says:

    yes: when there isn’t displaced arctic air, then spring is earlier and warmer – e.g. cherry blossom earlier in Washington.

    Similarly the pattern of climate in California is now drought, interspersed with extreme weather

    Climate change is just that… it isn’t an even slow warming across the globe.

    and I draw your attention to yet another winter with record low arctic sea ice and arctic sea ice showing signs of early melt and heading towards another set of record lows for the time of year. Posting the 2008 ice thickness map is not a counter (really? posting the ice state from after a record low year and comparing it with now?)

    • tonyheller says:

      Religious rantings from griff

    • TimA says:

      Yeah, but the nineties saw bill clinton overheating due to global warming….

    • AndyG55 says:

      “with record low arctic sea ice”

      WRONG as always griff.

      You REFUSE to learn.. you are INCAPABLE of learning.

      The current level of Arctic sea ice is STILL IN THE TOP 10% of Holocene sea ice extents


      I guess you just love LYING in those soaking wet yellow bed-sheets of yours, don’t you, poor little Arctic sea-ice bed-wetter..

    • AndyG55 says:

      Russian sea ice shows there is FAR MORE thick ice than 10 years ago.

      FACTS have to be IGNORED to keep that bed-wetting going, hey griff.

    • AndyG55 says:

      ” (really? posting the ice state from after a record low year and comparing it with now?)”

      griff does a moronic faceplant, ADMITTING that 2008 was a “record low year” (even if only after the EXTREMES of the late 1970s).

      Trend is dead flat for 10+ years griff.. ..

      … exactly as a sane person would expect from the phase of the AMO.

      Here is a non-AGW-propaganda sea ice chart since 1900

      2008 similar to 1938

      FACTS are an enema to you griff.

    • MrGrimNasty says:

      Claiming record lows by tiny margins when the sensors and algorithms and coastal maps have been repeatedly messed with! As for early melt – the extent increased after they announced the max., and volume is still on the up – and significantly above the last 2 years. Antarctic sea ice is also going up like a rocket – significantly above last year. There is nothing unusual happening at either pole, in recent, or longer term contexts.

      • Stewart Pid says:

        Coastal Masks.
        That is what DMI changed several years ago and then they eliminated the graph that wasn’t yielding the answer they sought.

  2. arn says:

    Early Spring= global warming
    late spring = climate change.

  3. Nicholas Schroeder, BSME, PE says:

    I’m performing an experiment in the classic tradition of R. W. Wood et. al. Long story how I got here and acquired the equipment.
    The setup is this:
    There is a round ceramic heating disc, no light otput, all IR. The wattage into this heater is measured, the heater surface temperature is measured by a type K T/C and an IR thermometer, a computer disc fan is used to create advection, a water spray bottle for latent.
    Data is collected with no power, with power, with power and water, with power and fan, and with power, fan and water. Wattage and input W/m^2 are constant.
    With all systems off, ambient conditions: see table.
    With power: see table.
    With power & water mist: When the disc is misted with water the temperature falls rapidly, but also recovers quickly as the water drips and evaporates.
    With power & fan: The fan reduces the surface temperature considerably at a constant wattage.
    With power & fan & water mist: much cooler together. Notice that the disc is cooled below input wattage with an emissivity of more than 1.0.
    Conduction/convection/advection/latent carries away W/m^2 so the radiative W/m^2 must be less ergo lower emissivity. The surface temperature is also lowered.
    I know how many watts I’m putting in. The surface temperature and S-B BB equation result in huge and impossible theoretical BB values. Emissivity must be used to match reality.
    Basically, this demonstrates my point that molecules carry away much of the heat with radiation picking up the leftovers and that a 1.0 emissivity is inappropriate for atmospheric up/down/”back” LWIR.
    Would like to do this in a vacuum, but will need a chamber built.

  4. Nicholas Schroeder, BSME, PE says:

    Too quick on the trigger.

  5. Nicholas Schroeder, BSME, PE says:


  6. Mark Green says:

    Please never ever ever quote the Mail or Express regarding meteorology….please please please…..

    It is a standing joke amongst the weather enthusiast community here in UK, like a stopped clock, even the above papers are eventually correct about the weather.

    They have no interest in actual meteorological information, only sensationalising it to sell papers.

    If you use their headlines to support actual science, they will fail you, they are wrong more then right.

    There is no Beast from the East 3 coming btw. It may snow up north, which in itself is something, but it ain’t BOTE, this is becoming an overused soundbite….

    Respectful Regards


Leave a Reply to TimA Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.