Boulder Three Year Old Sues Over Less Snow

Exxon Suncor = Floods, fires, less snow 

Boulder, Colorado – home of a nearly perfect climate – has three year old children suing Exxon over climate change. The last flood we had here was five years ago, last fire was six years ago, and snowfall has been increasing for over a century.

Boulder spearheads lawsuit seeking damages from ExxonMobil, Suncor over climate change impacts – Colorado Daily

I spent a summer in Boulder when I was three, and the main thing I remember is that it was really hot. It never gets really hot any more.

If oil companies stopped selling their product here, Boulder progressives would be desperately hysterical in about 12 hours. But they are that way most of the time anyway.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Boulder Three Year Old Sues Over Less Snow

  1. Griff says:

    No comment on the Hawaiian floods?

    Extreme weather in the US is increasing…

    • AndyG55 says:

      Hawaii flooded?

      What AGAIN???

      remain Hysterically IGNORANT, griff. its your only asset.

    • tonyheller says:

      Extreme weather has plummeted in the US

    • Gator says:

      No, even the IPCC admits there are no increasing trends in severe weather.

      “Overall, the most robust global changes in climate extremes are seen in measures of daily temperature, including to some extent, heat waves. Precipitation extremes also appear to be increasing, but there is large spatial variability”
      “There is limited evidence of changes in extremes associated with other climate variables since the mid-20th century”
      “Current datasets indicate no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency over the past century … No robust trends in annual numbers of tropical storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes counts have been identified over the past 100 years in the North Atlantic basin”
      “In summary, there continues to be a lack of evidence and thus low confidence regarding the sign of trend in the magnitude and/or frequency of floods on a global scale”
      “In summary, there is low confidence in observed trends in small-scale severe weather phenomena such as hail and thunderstorms because of historical data inhomogeneities and inadequacies in monitoring systems”
      “In summary, the current assessment concludes that there is not enough evidence at present to suggest more than low confidence in a global-scale observed trend in drought or dryness (lack of rainfall) since the middle of the 20th century due to lack of direct observations, geographical inconsistencies in the trends, and dependencies of inferred trends on the index choice. Based on updated studies, AR4 conclusions regarding global increasing trends in drought since the 1970s were probably overstated. However, it is likely that the frequency and intensity of drought has increased in the Mediterranean and West Africa and decreased in central North America and north-west Australia since 1950”
      “In summary, confidence in large scale changes in the intensity of extreme extratropical cyclones since 1900 is low”

      Why do you hate poor brown people Ms Gtiff?

    • AndyG55 says:

      “Extreme weather in the US is increasing…”

      You are a LIAR, griff

    • Robertv says:

      Are they not all dead because of the nuclear attack ?

    • arn says:

      Well Griff- your average off the mill ‘desaster’ you did not gave a shit about when you were young because noone on tv told you to do so.
      But nowadays you chimp out about one single irrellevant thing you have ignored by the dozens before it became très chique to worry about.

      Now please explain us why the number of hurricanes went down.
      It went so much down that they now even have to use average category 3 hurticanes to make them look like a category 6 apocalypse.
      There should have been a massive increase instead as warmer=more energy in the system=more energy to be unleashed=more energy related anomalies to occure.

  2. Gator says:

    The left always uses children to advance their agendas, mainly because they cannot make arguments that are convincing enough to get adults on board.

    • arn says:

      That’s why obama had always so many children in the backround when making his pr stunts.
      And that”s why Al Gore used picture of polar bear mom with her baby bear to “convince” us of warming.

      While in reality,when being asked about “500.000 thousand children died as the result of the iraq invasion”
      Miss Madeleine Albright said:”It was worth it”
      ((Iraq is now a ruined and failed state witz hundreds of terror attacks and a terroristic playground covered with uranium dust))

      No protest,no crying of the Mainstream media that is so worried about “children” that they always cry out loud when Assad or Putin can be blamed for just a single one of them.

  3. Gamecock says:

    Decadence. Suing the people who keep them alive. I wish them success.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.