How To Commit Green Genocide

Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities

– Voltaire

If you want to kill billions of people in a short period of time, a good way to do it would be cut off the supply of reliable energy, make the remaining unreliable energy very expensive, and then blot out the sun – so that people quickly freeze and starve.  Particularly those people who chose to be dependent on solar energy, based on your advice.

Dimming the sun: The answer to global warming?

Sun-dimming aerosols could curb global warming – CNN

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to How To Commit Green Genocide

  1. Johansen says:

    I want that contract!
    Seriously though, this is warfare on humanity. This isn’t over-zealous environmentalism any more. This is a well orchestrated attack on human beings by globalists who worship themselves

    • Johansen says:

      Creating sulfuric acid clouds to dim the sun. We have gone insane

    • arn says:

      Read the Georgia Guidestones:
      World population Population sub 500mio in “balance” with nature.

      I guess the huge internet-data-collecting thing Obama built in Utah will then chose the 8% of most willing,politically correct buttkissing feminsts,soyboys and sjw’s.
      The rest,as Hitlery said,are deplorables.

      Btw- this dimming is nothing new.
      They plan such stuff decades before,as eg. the destruction of european nations&sovereignities via EU or the flooding of western countries
      with “immigrants” as this is not just part of UN agenda but also was started at the same time in (60ies, in USA with the immigration reform act,europe with mass import of foreign workers and even australia)
      This dimming stuff to reflect sun rays away was already suggested by Edward Teller 30 years ago,
      though any idiot can see what negative impacts huge volcano outbreaks had on humanity when they dimmed the sun for month and years.

      And i would not be surprised if it turns out that many species went extinct because it got too cold because of dimmin.
      A warmer planet never was a problem for life on earth-a colder was and is.

    • AndyDC says:

      If given their way, a major Ice Age would probably be the end result. Not a bad way to eliminate world population by 95%, which is their main objective!

  2. Barkley says:

    “Experts” in the early 1970’s wanted to make Arctic ice and snow black to combat the coming ice age.

  3. Brian B Liebman says:

    So, if CAGW is driven by our use of carbon based fuels why would changing the amount of sunshine hitting the Earth help. Gore, Steyer, et al dismiss the Sun as a driver of the climate.

    I’m sorry to attempt to inject common sense. The Leftists that are driving all this madness rule by emotion not facts. And if it wasn’t the climate, it would be some other equally lame reason to push their coup against individual freedoms. Our civilization is rapidly devolving into anarchy.

    • Ari says:

      The don’t say the sun has no effect on climate. They say the VARIANCE of solar irradiance isn’t enough to have an effect on climate.

      • spike55 says:

        And that makes them TOTALLY IGNORANT.

        Only a very ignorant and moronic cretin thinks that TSI is the only solar variable.

    • Robertv says:

      Planet Venus is a lot cooler dimming the Sun. Imagine how hot it would be without blocking all that sunlight reaching the surface.

      • arn says:

        Imagine they do this dimming and at the same time a huge volcano erupts.

        3 billion graves to dig.

      • Weylan McAnally says:

        As I recall, the temperature of Venus at 1 atmosphere of pressure and adjusted for the shorter distance to the Sun is 33K – just like the Earth. The atmosphere of Venus is over 90% CO2. Seems like the composition of the atmosphere does not matter all that much for temperature. The mass of the atmosphere, well, that is a different story.

        • Squidly says:

          EXACTLY! … it makes no difference what the composition of a planet’s atmosphere is. So-called “greenhouse gasses” are coolants because of their high emissivity. A molecule that has high emissivity cannot “hold” heat, it dissipates it, rapidly. That exactly why CO2 is the most widely used industrial coolant in the world. That is why water is the most widely used general coolant in the world. The two primary “greenhouse gas” molecules are the most widely used coolant molecules in the world.

          If Venus’ atmosphere were 100% nitrogen, it would likely be somewhat warmer than it is now. The fact that it is 90% CO2 actually helps to cool it more than it would otherwise be, hower, as you state, the primary and overwhelming driver of an atmosphere’s temperature is not its composition, but its mass and the gravitational pull of the body for which that atmosphere orbits.

        • rah says:

          It’s the pressure man.

  4. GCsquared says:

    Sulfates, sulfates, what does that remind me of…Wait! I remember! Let’s reopen some of those old dirty coal plants that used to cause acid rain!

    I had a job once, which, I used to joke, was like being locked in a cage with a dumb, dangerous gorilla. Now it’s not just a job, but our whole world. Un-f’ing-believable. My mind is officially boggled.

  5. rah says:

    I propose we build large naval type guns and use them to blast fools that write this kind of stuff and morons that take it seriously to hell.

  6. Dave B says:

    What could possibly go wrong?

  7. Eric Simpson says:

    “If you want to kill billions of people”
    That seems to be just what the left dreams of:

    “A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer.” -Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University Ecoactivist

    “My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.” -David Foreman, Earth First!

    “Finally, we might decide that civilisation itself is worth preserving. In that case we have to work out what to save and which people would be needed in a drastically reduced population.” -Susan Blakemore, leftest UK Guardian science journalist

    “The planet is about to break out with fever, indeed it may already have, and we [human beings] are the disease. We should be at war with ourselves and our lifestyles.” -Thomas Lovejoy, Smithsonian Institution

    “Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.” -Maurice King, Research Fellow, University of Leeds

    “A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.” -United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment

    “I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. ” -John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal

    “Global warming will kill most of us, and turn the rest of us into cannibals.” -Ted Turner, Founder CNN … So why aren’t they all for global warming??

  8. DCA says:

    This sun-dimming capability already exists. It’s called a volcano.

  9. Gamecock says:

    A Russian nuclear response would be a justified.

    Geoengineering is a WMD.

  10. DCA says:

    OK, all of you who wish for a dimmer sun, please go stand in that line over there for the next shuttle to Mars. Thank you.

    • rah says:

      Easier than that. Just go North until you find the amount of reduced insolation you so desire.

    • czechlist says:

      Elon Musk, et al, logic
      Spend billions to escape from a planet that is supposedly becoming uninhabitable and go to a planet that is currently uninhabitable.
      If all of the technology was available today do you believe Musk would go?

      • arn says:

        He maybe an autist but he is not irresponsibly crazy.

        With a fraction of a fraction of the money one needs just to
        shoot a single human with the most basic equipment to mars to survive one decade
        he can built a 10acre superdome with all hightech+comfort he wants and needs +food and water for 1000years.
        (incl. a second smaller biosphere unit as last resort in case everything failes)

        Even the absolut worst case scenario on earth is 1000* better for survival than the best mars scenario.

      • arn says:


        if he would go,then just for the sake of becoming history
        as Armstrong did.
        But as long as his ego is not bigger than his will to survive he won’t go.

      • Squidly says:


        I laugh every time I hear the “Mars” talk. Especially the geoengineering to make it “habitable”. Only problem is, you cannot make Mars habitable. Mars has far too small of magnetosphere. The whole reason why it has such a tiny atmosphere right now. You can generate all the atmosphere you like, but the solar wind is just going to blow it away. Freaking loons .. have watched too much SciFi television .. and believe we can transform entire words when we can’t even properly manage the one we have. Absolute blithering idiots .. all of them!

  11. Disillusioned says:

    Obama never had a plan. He was given a script to follow. He doesn’t understand ‘the science’, and that’s why he butchers it badly and becomes a babbling idiot whenever he is off the teleprompter. He was made. The quintessential puppet. IMHO, of course.

    • Disillusioned says:

      Sheesh. The above post was supposed to be under “Fracking Inventor : Barack Obama.”

    • Johansen says:

      True, he doesn’t understand the science, but he’s a very willing participant in the hate-America crowd… he doesn’t need a script for that part. Both he and Mrs. Obama seem to have an immense axe to grind with America

    • Gamecock says:

      So we were ruled by TPOTUS . . . the TelePrompterOfTheUnitedStates.

      Orwell said, “He who controls the teleprompter controls the people.”

  12. Steelman says:

    Suddenly the chemtrail conspiracy got a new meaning. You know, when something like this come up, they have allready tested it.

  13. -B- says:

    Remember children, weather modification and aircraft spraying chemicals into the atmosphere are conspiracy theories. The various laws, regulations, scientific papers, and similar on these two subjects don’t mean anything. Nobody has ever done or proposed such a thing and you’re a paranoid conspiracy theorist if you think they have.

  14. Russell Cook says:

    Seems to me, if we aimed every nuke we had at the sun, we could put it out completely.

    What worries me is if you posed this statement to the CNN article author and other enviro-activist AGW believers, they might wrinkle their nose at it and say something like, “No need to be that drastic, but maybe if we used some of them, we could knock pieces off the sun so it would be cooler.

    • Squidly says:

      hahaha .. no kidding

      But FYI, all the nuclear weapons on planet Earth couldn’t even make a scratch on our Sun. It would have absolutely no measurable effect. The sun wouldn’t even notice. Larger energy anomalies happen every second of every day.

      • Gamecock says:


        The sun, like any star, is a balance between energy production and gravity. Pissant human bombs would push out tiny amounts of hydrogen, which would be immediately pulled back in by gravity. Wouldn’t even equal a CME.

  15. Joost says:

    Please wait a bit with sun blocking clouds, with growing ice in the arctic and the findings of mrs Zharkova it might get too cold ..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.