Mann Self-Identifies As A Rocket Scientist

This is not surprising, because he also self-identifies as a Nobel Prize winner and funniest of all – as a scientist.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Mann Self-Identifies As A Rocket Scientist

  1. spike55 says:

    Mickey Mann…. you are no rocket scientist.

    You are NOT a scientist of any sort.

    You are a fraudster and a charlatan.

    • gregole says:

      Klimate seance. Another in a long line of traditional charlatans and frauds. Count them among the perpetual-motion machine charlatans and other con-artists and tricksters throughout history.

      • gregole says:

        I did a quick search on “charlatans perpetual motion”, here’s a site that came up. Just replace perpetual motion with M@nn Made Climate Change.

        “Don’t be gullible, be sceptical.
        Look at the known facts. Carefully look at geometry, sizes, weights, assumptions. Are the facts complete enough for further analysis?
        Check, if all these assumptions are plausible. Try to figure out if the data are consistent in themselves.
        Carefully check, if all assumptions made in the description fit into known facts. Are there any simplifications which might have influence onto the expected function of a concept?
        Check, if the claimed function makes correct usage of the known principles in physics. Are there any implicit assumptions made? Are assumptions made which could be intended to mislead you?”

  2. Eben says:

    Climate scientists as Rocket scientists with results like this

  3. arn says:

    Come on-stop nitpicking Tony.
    There are legitimate claims that he is a 1/1024 nobel prize winner(cherokee version)

    (and if i was him i would consider myself a noble laureate.
    Considering that Al Gore got one for much less competence and crap talking
    and he has deserved one as well)

    • Jason Calley says:

      Viagra or not, the “Pillars of Climate” art project is certainly enough proof of CAGW. After all, 97% of scientifically illiterate art students agree that they feel CO2 is destroying the Earth. Muh feels!

      I suspect that Mann’s climate hockey stick was based on a Jackson Pollock “painting”.

  4. Gator says:

    Makes sense, they have utterly destroyed the credibility of the field of climatology. So why not change the nomenclature? That’s what leftists did when they started calling themselves liberals, and it still fools many to this very day.

  5. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    If rocket scientists were like climate scientists no rocket would ever reach orbit, because they would all be pointed in the wrong direction.

  6. Al Shelton says:

    Profile of the Sociopath
    This website summarizes some of the common features of descriptions of the behavior of sociopaths.
    Does M. Mann exhibit any of these?

    1. Glibness and Superficial Charm
    2. Manipulative and Conning
    3. They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.
    4. Grandiose Sense of Self
    5. Feels entitled to certain things as “their right.”
    6. Pathological Lying
    7. Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests.
    8. Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt
    9. A deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, is at their core. Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.
    10. Shallow Emotions
    When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.
    11. Incapacity for Love
    12. Need for Stimulation
    13. Living on the edge. Verbal outbursts and physical punishments are normal. Promiscuity and gambling are common.
    14. Callousness/Lack of Empathy
    Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others’ feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.
    15. Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature
    Rage and abuse, alternating with small expressions of love and approval produce an addictive cycle for abuser and abused, as well as creating hopelessness in the victim. Believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their impact on others.
    16. Irresponsibility/Unreliability
    Not concerned about wrecking others’ lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.

  7. Jimmy Haigh says:

    In Glasgow slang a “rocket” is a complete and utter raving lunatic so it’s quite appropriate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *