Painting The World Red At NOAA

NOAA shows the world burning up in September. Their red crayon traveled all over the planet.

September-2018-Global-Temperature-Percentiles-Map.png (993×743)

Never mind that they don’t actually have any thermometer data over half of the land surface. “Gray areas represent missing data.”

201809.gif (1052×743)

NOAA determined that Saudi Arabia was record hot, without any actual thermometer data.


The land data is fake, but 97% of fish live in the ocean. The fish are upset because much of the ocean data is fake too.

Just because the NOAA land and ocean data is fake, is no reason not to trust the scientific consensus.  They all come up with the same fake graph derived from the same fake data.

Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

41 Responses to Painting The World Red At NOAA

  1. Josh says:

    Why doesnt NASa cooperate with NOAA, which has satelite data showing Sep 2018 3rd coolest since 2000?

  2. frederik wisse says:

    This is socalled scientific redshift , meaning we are moving away rapidly from a habitable earth . The future will be very scary and what will happen to our children ?
    OMG act now before its too late and people start to realize they have been fooled !

    • R Shearer says:

      Meanwhile, it’s very cold outside here in Colorado but my gas fired furnace provides enough heat so that with clothing, including socks, slippers and a sweater, I am quite comfortable sipping my hot coffee brewed with mostly natural gs and coal generated electricity.

      The Democrats want to basically destroy the economics of natural gas generation in Colorado with the balloted Amendment 112. BTW, Colorado is blessed with tremendous resources and benefits greatly with the wealth and jobs they help create, notwithstanding the real comfort and protection they provide.

  3. frederik wisse says:

    This is socalled scientific redshift , meaning that we are moving away rapidly from a habitable future . Act fast before its too late and people realize they have been conned .

  4. Gator says:

    “1981-2010 base period”

    (Yawn) Oh that again.

  5. Psalmon says:

    Ok…I live in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. This Summer was cool compared to average. I trail run in the desert and mountains and we ran ALL Summer out there. Everyone who grew up here says 10 to 20 years ago Saudi Summers were MUCH hotter, that it has changed dramatically. If you could get the data, which is not easy around here, I’m sure it would be like your graphs for the US.

  6. EdB says:

    Thanks for the informative post.

    As confirmation of THs work is this peer reviewed paper:(link, and some discussion)

    I wonder if the authors developed their hypothesis after reading some of THs points years ago? in any case, they decided to find thermometers that would maximize the CO2 warming signal. Locations away from ocean influences were identified. The mean of the anomalies of these land based thermometers shows the late 1930s to early 1940s to be just as warm, if not warmer. Thus the null hypothesis, ie, that natural variations in the climate are the cause of what we are experiencing, still rules. Our CO2 might be doing some warming, but it is not evident.

    Is seems fair to ask the question: How has the NASA, NOAA, etc., been getting away with not doing such a sensitivity analysis before? It costs nothing, compared to the trillions spent on solutions to AGW.

    • paul courtney says:

      EdB: How have they been getting away with it? If the AGW scam collapsed in the forest and the press decided not to hear it, would it make a sound?
      One fine example, NBC decided to report this-“Swetnick says judge gang raped drunk teens”. but not report this-“Swetnick corroborating witness says not so, Swetnick lawyer fabricated affidavit and tricked me.” Why not story #2? Well, they were working on corroborating story #2 when they went forward on (uncorroborated) story #1. By the time they got past Avennati’s obstruction (could have said “Avennati’s suborning of perjury”, but nbc didn’t go there) and confirmed that the “corroboration” was a lie, well, it just wasn’t a story anymore, the hearing was over (vote still days away). This was admitted by nbc three weeks AFTER the story might have made a difference to say Lisa Murkowski and three or four dem senators.
      Our friends at NASA and NOAA are 90-95% confident in some matters, but 100%+ confident that the press will never embarrass “scientists”.

      • Gator says:

        A TV reporter I know once admitted to me that the MSM lies, constantly. He explained that their lies are usually lies of omission rather than commission, meaning that they leave out information that would otherwise falsify their reporting.

  7. John Bills says:

    Land Surface Air Temperature Data Are Considerably Different Among BEST‐LAND, CRU‐TEM4v, NASA‐GISS, and NOAA‐NCEI

  8. steve case says:

    Plus over the last two decade NOAA or GISS (Does it make a difference?) have adjusted the monthly entries probably close to 100,000 times. Here’s what the changes have done to the warming trend:

  9. Steve Niemiec says:

    So, nothing has warmed, but it must have done because we say it has!
    BBC UK: Climate change: Oceans ‘soaking up more heat than estimated’

  10. R. de Haan says:

    How long will Trump accept the fact that NOAA is still in opposition of his Presidency?

  11. R. de Haan says:

    After the next elections, Trump really have to clean house, drain the Swamp, finish the Wall, take on the Fed and the UN, stop the useless wars and finally set up the Military Tribunals to take care of the crooked Hillary and her Gang of criminals and traitors including George S and all the other snake oil salesmen and Globalists who conspired against the US including Al Gore and the Climate Mafia.

  12. Mr Sir says:

    So are you you also gonna talk about how one of most northern areas of Alaska spent almost all of October far above its average or what?

  13. Joshua munoz says:

    People are you that stupid… Remember the bouyes have sonar and radar installed…. Rass you guys are stupid. The earth is warming, and dying. You guys are so fucking stupid.

    • tonyheller says:

      Climate alarmists are angry, dimwitted, and deranged

    • Gator says:

      Ahhh, settled science! LOL

      Josh baby, care to prove that it is not you who is fucking stupid? Here is your chance…

      1- List all climate forcings, order them from most to least effectual, and then quantify them all.

      2- Please provide even one peer reviewed paper that refutes natural variability as the cause of recent, or any, global climate changes.

      There is nothing unusual or unprecedented about our climate, or how we got here. For 4,500,000,000 years climates have always changed, naturally. This means there has been a set precedent, and the burden of proof falls on natural climate change deniers like yourself.

    • spike55 says:

      Such erudite brain-washed ranting. :-)

      Please continue, Joshua, you epitomise the very best of the AGW apologists.

      Did you know that NASA’s own data shows a rise in sea temperature in the 0-2000m whole of ocean, of just 0.08ºC in 60 odd years.

      But do keep up the MANIC PANIC, little mind….. its hilarious. :-)

    • Rah says:

      Hey! Another mushroom popped up. Kept in the dark and fed buckets if $h!t and loving it.

    • Disillusioned says:

      Yes Joshua, I remember the buoys. And the radiosondes. And the satellites. They don’t agree with your claims.

      Oh, I noticed in your demagogic rant, you forgot to call us “white nationalists” or racists with “white privilege.” Surely you’ll do better next time.

    • spike55 says:

      UAH for October released

      COOLER than.. 2017, 2015, 2016, 1998, 2003, 2005, 2014, 2012.

      Year to date..

      COOLER than 1998, 2016, 2010, 2017, 2015, 2002

      USA48: October is in 15th place out of 40

      Australia: October is in 18th place out of 40

  14. Steve Niemiec says:

    FFS! Here’s another load of bull from the impartial BBC:
    Hotter days and ‘tropical nights’ for UK
    Every day another stupid ‘report’ with no evidence whatsoever of the link to human activity – although they say different!

  15. Steve N says:

    FFS! Here’s another load of bull from the impartial BBC:
    Hotter days and ‘tropical nights’ for UK
    Every day another stupid ‘report’ with no evidence whatsoever of the link to human activity – although they say different!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.