This video is a must watch for anyone wanting to understand the climate crisis scam.
Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- rah on Virginia Democrat Loses Wyoming Republican Primary
- Gordon Vigurs on Greens Invent Wind Powered Ship
- Stuart Hamish on That Didn’t Take Long
- Robert L Gipson on Journalism Runs Even Drier
- Jack the Insider on That Didn’t Take Long
Archives
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Wow!!!
This was SUPER CLEAR and very understandable. I have not seen a better explanation anywhere about these temperature data set alterations, you seem to have a complete mastery of the material – and you kept my complete attention the full 27 minutes!
I will definitely pass this around.
Thanks!
Watched on YouTube this morning. The unteachable seem to have attention spans much shorter than 27 minutes!
I just wanted to let you know I’m a fan and enjoy the work that you do.
You understand that this makes you a racist. Or, what’s the label for people who don’t like women? Or etc. etc.
You understand that racist is the label (or one of the other important tools of labeling & name calling) used when you have a well thought out point of view, coupled with the logic and the data to support it. Especially when your opinion runs counter to the flavor of the day. All that is left in terms arguments, is labeling and name calling.
Keep up the good work!!
Dave P.
Thanks for highlighting this NOAA study in that NYT piece in the video. It’s interesting to see how they go back and cool the past and warm the present to present the appearance of greater warming. It does seem odd that all adjustments seem to only cool the past and only warm more recent years.
Tony, I posted a picture of the time series temperature study highlighted in the NYT piece in your video. I went to post a screen cap of the conclusions from that study and I was blocked with this message. I don’t know if this is some generic trap or if I truly did something wrong. Any idea?
Thanks for all you do!
Cloudflare Ray ID: 5015fbcbaecbc7d1
Wow!! Trump should see this!
Would the deliberate falsification of data not be a crime of fraud?
Dear Sir,
I have a question. How to solve the problem, that Missouri is located from about 230 feet above sea level to 1,772 feet above sea level with a mean elevation of the state is 800 feet above sea level.
The problem for the stations is that we know from the barometric hight formula that the temperature falls 0.65K/100m. So if we would have all stations located on 230 feet above sea level the temperature for Missouri would be x, and all stations on 1,772 feet above sea level, it would be about 15 K warmer.
How about a short video of just the first chart showing the NOAA “adjustment” of the temperature record — so we can send it to our representatives — They need something simple to read and hopefully, understand.
Completely, totally, and in all other ways, fascinating!!
Thanks!
Can I pre-order your book? I’d like to have autographed copies for my climate alarmist friends for Christmas.
Gavin Schmidt should be behind bars, this is intentional fraud.
Richard Lindzen agrees with you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUBrV0VFcbY
Schmidt is a liar as well as a cheat, quote
“I had about 400 emails in the hacked email package…15 years of emails and people were picking and choosing out of them. People were kind of like putting them together in weird orders that made it seem like one email was talking about this event when it was really talking about something else. There was a lot of confusion.” unquote.
ĹOL The only confusion was how to save face and butt.
The BBC news is as fake as tits on a bull.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/07/11/bbc-tries-airbrush-climategate-out-history/
I’m a climate skeptic, but I like to see back and forth where possible because it helps increase or decrease my confidence levels in the various positions. This video seems very convincing, and confirms some things that I have seen in other places. But I always look for debunkers and debunker debunkers, etc. I found one just today that seems to indicate that the lattitude of temperature stations has been increasing (moving north thus giving cooler readings) which would justify at least some of the upward adjustments that have been made. Can you (or anyone reading) address this issue?
Here is the link in question:
http://gregladen.com/blog/2018/08/08/how-steve-goddard-a-k-a-tony-heller-does-bad-science/
Thanks
Greg Laden is a liar. I have personally dealt with this scumbag.
His assertion is pure BS…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58mDaK9bH5o
As the above video clearly shows, stations at higher latitudes and altitudes, stations in rural and landlocked areas, have been systematically removed in favor of lower latitude, lower altitude, marine influenced, and highly UHI corrupted areas.
Then there is the MMTS problem…
Differing daily measured values from the old and new sensors for temperature measurement spurred the author [Hager] to conduct a comparison spanning from January 1, 1999 to July 31, 2006 at Fliegerhorst Lechfeld (WMO 10856) 8-1/2 years long, daily without interruption, among other comparison tests of mercury maximum glass thermometers in a Stevenson screen and a Pt 100 resistance thermometer inside an aluminum enclosure, both unventilated. The 3144 days yielded a mean difference of +0.93°C; the Pt 100 was higher than the mercury thermometer. The maximum daily difference even reached 6.4°C!
https://notrickszone.com/2015/01/13/weather-instrumentation-debacle-analysis-shows-0-9c-of-germanys-warming-may-be-due-to-transition-to-electronic-measurement/#sthash.zK7f0by5.o2xFsZEd.dpbs
Again, Greg Laden is a liar.