The Wyoming governor wants the state to be carbon negative. We did some research this afternoon to test his idea out.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
Recent Comments
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on Doubling Energy Costs
- Francis Barnett on Doubling Energy Costs
I wonder if Tho’s catastrophe theory, so beloved of the alarmists, applies to propaganda. Initially more and more believe the lie, until it reaches a level of absurdity that only a fool could believe it. Beyond that tipping point further promotion of the nonsense becomes counter productive and the number of believers falls off rapidly. We see this with the left’s slanderous portrayal of Trump, the more they insult him, the more popular he becomes. The more hysterical the alarmists claims, the less the public believe them. I’m fairly sure this tipping point was reached a few years ago, so as is always the case when the propaganda fails, the narrative must be reinforced with censorship and suppression.
Sorry, I meant Thom’s catastrophe theory
Breaking Climate News !!!
John Kerry steps down as Biden’s chief climate scaremonger.
The exact date of Kerry’s departure has not yet been set, although it will probably be between late February and late April, the people said. Kerry is still scheduled to attend the Munich Security Conference in mid-February, and he is traveling to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, next week.
(In one of his extensive range of executive jets no doubt)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/john-kerry-to-step-down-as-top-u-s-climate-change-negotiator/ar-AA1mVuk1
Up here in Alberta where it is -43C, solar and wind was producing 0.024% of our electricity at 5:30am today despite being 29.6% of the installed grid “capacity” and over 50% of the capital investment in electricity generation. Based on the current crop of 2,663 wind turbines and 17,677 solar panels in Alberta, we would need 106,520 wind turbines and 707,800 solar panels to properly power our small population. At the current rate of installation, that will take 449 years. Good job greenies!
Apologies, I mis-typed, it was 0.02497% of of the electrical generation, not 0.024%.
So on many days Alberta could not even power the most basic stuff with green nenergy = no energy at all.
Not even pumps to keep water flowing through the pipes.
Back to the 18th century – that’s progressivism.
I loved Scott Moe’s twitter feed from SK.
https://twitter.com/PremierScottMoe/status/1746358945290019025
Every day we wake up in a world that is trying to kill us with extremes in weather conditions. No matter where we live. It may be cold, heat, rain, snow, wind, whatever. Somewhere in the past our ancestors found this fantastic stuff called hydrocarbons. We use it to fight back against “mother nature” and thus live longer and more comfortable lives. They have proven useful for both heating, and cooling as well as materials and energy to manipulate materials for our convenience. And, yes, we are willing to expend some of that energy to clean up the relatively small mess our use of those hydrocarbons makes. But I’m not sure what idiot came up with the idea of doing away with them. I suggest anybody who feels this way make an example for us all to see. For now, I’ll keep my hydrocarbons.