Some spectacularly fraudulent data tampering by NOAA at Mongu, Zambia
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Hank Phillips on Climate Attribution Model
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”

The WEF boasts that they ‘own’ the science, so that if they need to announce at Davos that 2003 was the hottest year on record, their bought and paid for minions will provide the supporting data.
The question now is:
Where does science end and where does organized crime begin?
Considering the scale and the methodology to rewrite and manipulate data world wide towards warming, it seems that the word consensus is just the equivalent to the MIC’s humanitary aid – a term to justify large scale criminal activity with the aim to always create a predetermined specific outcome .
Yes, it is indeed organized crime. For a term that describes what the government-funded climate seance industry is doing, collusion seems closer to the mark than consensus.
CON census
is pretty accurate.
If NOAA was a private company, at the very least the DOJ would have them in court to face civil fines and the Board of Directors would be facing criminal charges.
We have spent TRILLIONS of dollars for EV, Windmills,Solar Panels all because of this fraud.
I don’t believe that for a second. It’s what side you’re on – not a private vs. public issue. If you are corrupting data for the Cabal, you will be protected. Whether you are a private entity or work in a government agency, is totally irrelevant.
I tried to post a comment, cloudflare did it’s stuff, I ticked the box and got this.
This page isn’t workingIf the problem continues, contact the site owner.
HTTP ERROR 405
its all about $$$$$$$$ Lurch aka J Kerry wants to die a Billionaire as does Al Gore