Earth was much warmer 5,000 years ago when atmospheric CO2 levels were lower – so people whose income depends on climate alarmism had to rewrite history.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Quadrupled Border Crossings
- “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Hottest Day Ever
- Radical Communist Donald Harris
- Same Weather As Always
- “Climate Change Is Killing People”
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Miami Drowning
- Blocked By Ice
- Will He Be Disappointed?
- Don’t Be A Conspiracy Theorist
- Washington Post Spy Analyst
- Summer Heat And Burn Area
- Climate Heresy
- “I do not want to hear about the 1930s”
- “33 storms”
- Something New In North Dakota
- Survival Of The Planet
- “baseless far-right conspiracy theory”
- The BBC
- Biden Uniting America
- Firearms Safety Rules For Actors
- Science Banned In France
- Global Warming in Nevada
- Saving The Climate With Soy
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- arn on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- Bob G on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- Gamecock on Radical Communist Donald Harris
- Luigi on Hottest Day Ever
- Disillusioned on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Bob G on Hottest Day Ever
- Bob G on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Bob G on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- arn on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
Another terrific summary video; I love the comparisons between climate scare mongering “theories” and basic concrete facts that can’t simply be wished away by theorists.
Another fact that I’d add (you’ve stated it many times) to the video is that the thickness of Arctic sea ice averages just two or three METERS, compared to the multiple kilometer thickness of ice in the Antarctic and Greenland. It’s amazing to me that the extent and thickness of Arctic sea ice has been relatively constant during my lifetime.
The ‘theory’ is really folklore. Material copied from lecturer’s blackboard to student’s notes, without passing through the brain of either. Anybody who actually understands the material, as opposed to merely manipulating equations or parroting the text book, will easily see through it.
Junk science from the alarmists has brought science in general into disrepute, so all manner of crank ideas are gaining ground, on the basis that their supporting evidence is no more ridiculous than the rubbish the climate cult is presenting.
its NOT JUNK science its a $$$$$$$$$$$ making SCAM
We don’t need no stinkin’ data! Who ya gonna believe, climate scientists or your lyin’ eyes?