Earth was much warmer 5,000 years ago when atmospheric CO2 levels were lower – so people whose income depends on climate alarmism had to rewrite history.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- Latest Research In Climate Science
- UK Sucking Carbon
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
Recent Comments
- oeman50 on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Gamecock on Latest Research In Climate Science
- arn on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- gordon vigurs on Latest Research In Climate Science
- gordon vigurs on UK Sucking Carbon
- Bob G on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Tel on Latest Research In Climate Science
Another terrific summary video; I love the comparisons between climate scare mongering “theories” and basic concrete facts that can’t simply be wished away by theorists.
Another fact that I’d add (you’ve stated it many times) to the video is that the thickness of Arctic sea ice averages just two or three METERS, compared to the multiple kilometer thickness of ice in the Antarctic and Greenland. It’s amazing to me that the extent and thickness of Arctic sea ice has been relatively constant during my lifetime.
The ‘theory’ is really folklore. Material copied from lecturer’s blackboard to student’s notes, without passing through the brain of either. Anybody who actually understands the material, as opposed to merely manipulating equations or parroting the text book, will easily see through it.
Junk science from the alarmists has brought science in general into disrepute, so all manner of crank ideas are gaining ground, on the basis that their supporting evidence is no more ridiculous than the rubbish the climate cult is presenting.
its NOT JUNK science its a $$$$$$$$$$$ making SCAM
We don’t need no stinkin’ data! Who ya gonna believe, climate scientists or your lyin’ eyes?