Ten degrees above normal in the midwest.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
funny how people could feel the heat when it was hot
nowadays it’s cold when it’s warm so only climatologists can understand
so only climatologists can understand
nice!
A mother and baby are shown trying to sleep in the park.
Does any of the following sound familiar?
Co2, the Satanic gas.
Wow, none of you figured out that a map that shows the difference from “normal” is only meaningful when you know what that “normal” is?
Yes, 1934 was 10 deg. F above average, but the average was the PRE-1934 average. If you made the same map for 1934 but compared to the 1971 to 2000 average, you would see a very different map.
It’s amazing how you guys can’t even figure out how to read and display a graph accurately, but dare to suggest the scientists are engaged in fraud!
Unless you DO know the error you’ve made, and it was intentional…. A case of the pot calling the kettle black?
Don’t start spamming the thread.
As I have already explained to you, the discrepancy is at least an order of magnitude larger than any possible differences in the baseline. Given the precision of the color bands (2 degrees) a few tenths of a degree will not have any effect on the maps.
Now take a deep breath and try using your brain.