Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Allan Shelton on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- DD More on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Disillusioned on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Disillusioned on 65 Years Of Progress!
0.8% of their usage. I wonder if the cost is congruent with 0.8%?
The .8% just displaces .8% percent, which could have been delivered by existing convetional sources so I don’t see any way how any wind costs are justified considering that wind is the most expensive form of electrical generation.
Yep, any and all additional costs of construction, maintenance, and delivery went towards………absolutely nothing.
Yes, but that .8% makes you feel so good about saving the planet!