Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Gordon Vigurs on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Bob G on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- conrad ziefle on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Bob G on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Jack the Insider on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- scott allen on Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- conrad ziefle on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Francis Barnett on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Jack the Insider on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
How odd….
He admits that these places are sinking faster than the sea is rising…
…and still says we can fix it by stopping CO2
A slight factor-of-ten error in the article, making climate-driven sea level rise even more benign than we thought…
“…put the range closer to two or three feet by century’s end. That averages out to about two or three inches per year.”
Assuming 3 feet/century, that comes to 0.36 inches/year, a factor of 10 smaller than the 3 inches/year claimed, and a factor of 3 larger than what is currently observed (0.1 inches/year).
Subsidence rates are a factor of 10 larger than this in some areas, yet societies adapt and thrive if they have sufficient wealth.
Our distant descendants, if they think of us at all, might thank us as they twirl their pasta in the canal-side cafes of an even-more-ancient Venice or only-partially-waterlogged Manhattan in 5000 AD.
Is this guy serious? 5000AD? Does it make any difference to us if sea levels have risen 30 feet since 1000BC and flooded out a few archeological remnants?
I love Venice at high tide….
…this is funny >>>> http://www.greenpacks.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/venice-flood-wakeboarding-2008.jpg
Here’s a clue: don’t build pretty buildings where waters are known to rise.