GISS Diverging From HadCRUT At 0.8C Per Century

7 Responses to GISS Diverging From HadCRUT At 0.8C Per Century

1. David Appell says:

   April 11, 2013 at 1:54 am

   Why do you insist on censoring comments you don’t like?

   Bad, bad boy….

   Reply
   • stevengoddard says:

     April 11, 2013 at 1:57 am

     Nothing wrong with dissent. Spam and abusive comments will be blocked.

     You said that GISS agreed with other data sets, and I showed that you are incorrect.

     Reply
     • Dave N says:

       April 11, 2013 at 2:01 am

       Abuse: last bastion of those who can’t win an argument

       Reply
2. Will Nitschke says:

   April 11, 2013 at 2:23 am

   I argue with Steve sometimes, quit aggressively. He has never blocked me. Then again I don’t name call or spam.

   Reply
   • Ben says:

     April 11, 2013 at 5:18 pm

     Same here Will.

     I’ve never been blocked, despite on occasion disagreeing vociferously with Steven.

     Steven detects and respects the quest for truth.

     Reply
3. Ray says:

   April 11, 2013 at 8:48 am

   I notice that this is based on HadCRUT3, which of course has been replaced by HadCRUT4.
   In fact however, there is also an increasing divergence of GISS from HadCRUT4 since about 1946 although it is lower than that from HadCRUT3.
   Prior to that, from about 1894, GISS anomalies fall relative to both HC3 aqnd HC4.
   Around 1946, GISS and HC3/4 anomalies are about the same, but in 1947, there is a “step change” in divergence in HC3 but not in HC4. which of course is due to a jump in HC4 relative to HC3.

   Reply
   • stevengoddard says:

     April 11, 2013 at 10:17 am

     Hansen pressured Phil Jones into making a fake HadCRUT4 which was closer to GISS

     Reply