Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
Recent Comments
- arn on Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- dm on Extreme Weather
- Mike on 70C At Lisbon
- Mike on Extreme Weather
- conrad ziefle on Extreme Weather
- Luigi on 70C At Lisbon
- Luigi on 70C At Lisbon
- Bob G on Extreme Weather
- arn on 70C At Lisbon
- Gordon Vigurs on Extreme Weather
1907 Monthly Weather Review Said That Bloggers Need To Call Out NOAA/NASA Data Tampering
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
I’m sure they believe that they are applying new and improved methods to data presentation. The fact that the last 50 years gets warmer and the preceding 100 get colder is merely the result of the improved methods. There is no expectation bias, much less data tampering. I’m also sure that 3, 12, 16, 22, 30 and 36 are the next lottery winners. [/sarc]
We know the warming is unprecedented, so the data must be wrong.
I think they were called ‘blockers’ back then.
They were lying about the climate of the Oklahoma Panhandle to attract more land jobbers, they didn’t want people back east to know the climate was very dry there.
How did that work out for the 1930’s dust bowlers, now in California?
That would make an interesting compendium: “The History of Climate Lies”.