Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Disillusioned on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Disillusioned on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Francis Barnett on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- dm on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- arn on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Tel on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Gamecock on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
Reblogged this on CACA.
Smokey (dbstealey) Just pointed out that Zeke Hausfather’s BEST graph of the UK “…shows that the temperature in England has just dropped below year 1750.”
And he is RIGHT! (Glad I wasn’t taking a sip of tea when I read that.)
http://berkeleyearth.lbl.gov/regions/united-kingdom-(europe)
AGW = Anti Goldilocks Weather
GISS = Goldilocks Inspired Socialist Science
The IPCC actually said in the Science Report in TAR:
“In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.’ – I 2001 section 4.2.2.2 page 774
And yet those very same climatologist-clowns continue to proclaim that the CO2 based warming is real!!!
And they get so annoyed when they aren’t believed by the realists……
What a difference it makes when a newspaper reports instead of promotes! And accepts and prints comments from both sides of a story! How
Maybe all it takes is for journalists/editors/owners to take a refresher course in journalistic principles. The world would be a better place instantly.
Spot on. Skeptics rock.
@Shazaam: As for atmospheric CO2 levels, it’s not a climate driver triggering irreversible and dangerous Global Warming and… it’s not a poisonous gas.Both claims represent the core of the AGW proponents and they are just plain wrong. Period.
Pushing through taxes and policies based on this wrong claim despite observational evidence is pure Fascism.
Now act accordingly and throw the bums out of government.
History shows that if you’re betting always fade the climate alarminst.
Skeptics 2, Alarmists 0.
The warming from 1979 to 1998 is consistent with global cooling.
I think so too. Could it be that those who expected global cooling were right the first time?
Yes.
William McClenney, a geologist said:
“..we had better hope and pray some well-mixed trace gas can delay the next glacial inception. Onset of the Little Ice Age after the Medieval Warm Period, right when the Holocene reached about half a precession cycle old, was harrowing enough. The Modern Warm Period, reportedly less warm then the MWP, marks the second thermal pulse, a few centuries older than half a precession cycle…
Five of the 6 interglacials dating back to the Mid Pleistocene Transition have each lasted just half of a precessional cycle.
There is a very intense debate, happening right now, regarding which of the most recent interglacials is the best analogue for the present one, the Holocene…. On balance, what emerges is that projections on the natural duration of the current interglacial depend on the choice of analogue, while corroboration or refutation of the “early anthropogenic hypothesis” on the basis of comparisons with earlier interglacials remains irritatingly inconclusive…”
This is what he is talking about.
From the paper Can we predict the duration of an interglacial?
The solar insolation for 21 June at 65? N and CO2 for termination of several interglacials.
Current values are insolation = 479 and CO2 = 400 ppmv.
MIS 7e – insolation = 463 W m?2, CO2 = 256 ppmv
MIS 11c – insolation = 466 W m?2, CO2 = 259-265 ppmv
MIS 13a – insolation = 500 W m?2, CO2 = 225 ppmv
MIS 15a – insolation = 480 W m?2, CO2 = 240 ppmv
MIS 17 – insolation = 477 W m?2, CO2 = 240 ppmv
From the paper
That paper goes on to say
The bipolar seesaw is the melting of the arctic and the ice building in the Antarctica that we have been seeing for the last couple of decades just in case you did not know. This is why I have been looking at the Antarctic Circumpolar Current and Drake Passage since they influence the El Nino or La Nina formation that effects the weather for the entire world.
In 1976, Hansen was a skeptic.