Hockey Stick Finally Located

The entire US temperature trend is due to NASA/NOAA data tampering

ScreenHunter_371 Feb. 08 12.26


ScreenHunter_422 Feb. 09 22.23

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Hockey Stick Finally Located

  1. ACR says:

    Half the time the Hockey Team is telling us that temperatures above the long term average are conclusive evidence of AGW. The other half of time, the Hockey Team is telling us that temperatures below average, if not caused by AGW, are to be expected, but that the dice are loaded.

  2. Andy DC says:

    There many places in the US that have averaged 15-30 degrees F below normal so far this February. There will have to be superexponential data tampering to adjust this frigid winter out of existence.

    • Jason Calley says:

      Just because the tampering will be huge, blatant, and obviously fraudulent, don’t think that will stop them. most citizens will believe what they are told to believe.

      My wife was speaking to a friend today. The friend told her that “Now that the Arctic Ocean is open to shipping, we can expect more globalization.” I know the lady who told her this. The sad part is that she is not stupid. Ignorant, yes, but not stupid.

  3. omanuel says:

    Data tampering also brought us:

    1. The standard solar model
    2. The standard nuclear model
    3. Oscillation solar neutrinos
    4. Big Bang cosmology to
    5. Imaginary Black Holes

  4. Andy Oz says:

    I’m not saying NOAA is corrupt…..but everyone else is!!
    Geez how much CO2 and soot (aka smoke) do you need to know there is a fire!
    NOAA has about as much credibility as Bernie Madoff.

    • Andy Oz says:

      Former head of NOAA, Lubchenco, joined as director of “family planning” foundation. What were the chances of that happening? Climate change and eugenics seem to go hand in hand.

      • omanuel says:


        Government science advisors and heads of research agencies educational institutions are desperately trying to maintain an illusion of honest government science in the face of overwhelming evidence that scientific and educational institutions have been accepting public funds to deceive the public.

        The integrity of governments, academic and scientific organizations were sacrificed to save the world from possible nuclear annihilation in 1945 when it was agreed to Unite Nations, to rule people with hysterical rhetoric, and to hide the abundant source of energy that powers our beautiful, bountiful, benevolent universe from the cores of:

        1. Heavy atoms like Uranium
        2. Some planets like Jupiter
        3. Ordinary stars like the Sun
        4. Galaxies like the Milky Way

        This corruption of science was first exposed when Climategate emails revealed manipulation of data to fit a political agenda in Nov 2009, . . .

        . . . Yet most critics (except Donna Lafamboise) could not then, and will not now, believe that federal research agencies were already manipulating observations and data to fit the UN’s agenda when President Eisenhower specifically warned of this threat to our form of government in Jan 1961:

        With deep regrets,
        – Oliver K. Manuel
        Former NASA Principal
        Investigator for Apollo

        PS – Those who doubt my conclusions should try for themselves to get any member of the UN’s IPCC, the UK’s Royal Society, the US or any other National Academy of Sciences, or the Swedish or Norwegian Nobel Prize Committee to publicly address three figures of precise experimental data (Figures 1-3, pages 19-27, my autobiography) that falsify standard post-1945 models of stars and nuclei.

  5. Hugh K says:

    Creating a hockey stick coincides with NASA’s spaced-out implementation of their muslim outreach goal via subliminal imagery, thereby encouraging the followers of the ‘religion of peace’ to redirect their combative ways to the mellow sport of hockey. Only in big government bizzaro world….

  6. Brian H says:

    Steve, could you graph the adjustments side-by-side with the “anomaly” record?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *