Please ignore the fact that most of the Northern Hemisphere and Antarctica are running far below normal.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
Recent Comments
- Mike Haseler (Scottish Sceptic) on Back To The Future
- Tel on Back To The Future
- arn on Back To The Future
- Walter on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Brodirt on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
2%….until its above Normal….then it becomes 97%….
We need a Warmist to come on and explain again how global warming causes global cooling.
The hotter we get the colder we get, or something like that. Anyway, it is always hilarious.
Too bad they can’t use Mercator’s projection to make the north pole and Alaska look really big and the Goode Homosoline projection for the southern hemisphere. Think of all the red ink they’d use.
But Greenland is hot! The ice cap is melting! We are all going to die!
I’m more concerned with S. America. It’s widely known that increasing normalcy is strongly associated with rising carbon (not CO2, carbon because that makes no sense)
The more normaler it gets the worser it are.
Not only does the projection make the north look really big, but here are no surface weather stations in that red blob in the upper left. Go figure.
It really does look like the Artic has a huge hot spot — maybe they should prepare for an onslaught of Spring Breakers!
Australia takes up even less than 2%; then there’s the fact we have far less emissions (sorry alarmists, the “per head” argument doesn’t change the total volume, which is what counts according to alarmists own theories). Meanwhile, we’ve spent $7bn on a close enough to zero result:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/billions-in-tax-but-only-03pc-fall-in-carbon-emissions/story-e6frg6xf-1226818073028#
(paywalled, but the summary is damning enough)
..but hey, Joo-liar said we’re “doing the right thing” and “leading the way”. In terms of complete and utter lunacy, yes.
Aurora Australis at Casey station bringing the latest much-needed supplies before winter . It could be a long one.
http://www.antarctica.gov.au/webcams/casey
http://www.antarctica.gov.au/webcams/aurora
ftp://sidads.colorado.edu/DATASETS/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/data/SH_seaice_extent_nrt.csv
The WMO announce that 90% of the excess heat produced by humans has been absorbed into the ocean and that (unlike the IPCC) they are 100% certain global warming is happening. That would explain why there is almost no anomaly on the ocean surface! You would have to be 100% delusional or insane to make this stuff up.
http://m.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/was-the-sixthhottest-year-on-record-un-says/story-e6frg8y6-1226819287966
And the charts only go back to 1950, not 1850 as in the announcement. Because the 1930’s never happened.
http://main.omanobserver.om/?p=54317
If the US makes up only 2% of the World’s surface how much of the World’s Climate Science does it make up ?