Please ignore the fact that most of the Northern Hemisphere and Antarctica are running far below normal.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- dearieme on “even within the lifetime of our children”
- John Francis on The Anti-Greta
- John Francis on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Luigi on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
2%….until its above Normal….then it becomes 97%….
We need a Warmist to come on and explain again how global warming causes global cooling.
The hotter we get the colder we get, or something like that. Anyway, it is always hilarious.
Too bad they can’t use Mercator’s projection to make the north pole and Alaska look really big and the Goode Homosoline projection for the southern hemisphere. Think of all the red ink they’d use.
But Greenland is hot! The ice cap is melting! We are all going to die!
I’m more concerned with S. America. It’s widely known that increasing normalcy is strongly associated with rising carbon (not CO2, carbon because that makes no sense)
The more normaler it gets the worser it are.
Not only does the projection make the north look really big, but here are no surface weather stations in that red blob in the upper left. Go figure.
It really does look like the Artic has a huge hot spot — maybe they should prepare for an onslaught of Spring Breakers!
Australia takes up even less than 2%; then there’s the fact we have far less emissions (sorry alarmists, the “per head” argument doesn’t change the total volume, which is what counts according to alarmists own theories). Meanwhile, we’ve spent $7bn on a close enough to zero result:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/billions-in-tax-but-only-03pc-fall-in-carbon-emissions/story-e6frg6xf-1226818073028#
(paywalled, but the summary is damning enough)
..but hey, Joo-liar said we’re “doing the right thing” and “leading the way”. In terms of complete and utter lunacy, yes.
Aurora Australis at Casey station bringing the latest much-needed supplies before winter . It could be a long one.
http://www.antarctica.gov.au/webcams/casey
http://www.antarctica.gov.au/webcams/aurora
ftp://sidads.colorado.edu/DATASETS/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/data/SH_seaice_extent_nrt.csv
The WMO announce that 90% of the excess heat produced by humans has been absorbed into the ocean and that (unlike the IPCC) they are 100% certain global warming is happening. That would explain why there is almost no anomaly on the ocean surface! You would have to be 100% delusional or insane to make this stuff up.
http://m.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/was-the-sixthhottest-year-on-record-un-says/story-e6frg8y6-1226819287966
And the charts only go back to 1950, not 1850 as in the announcement. Because the 1930’s never happened.
http://main.omanobserver.om/?p=54317
If the US makes up only 2% of the World’s surface how much of the World’s Climate Science does it make up ?