Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
Recent Comments
- Peter Carroll on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Tel on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Gordon Vigurs on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Gordon Vigurs on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Bob G on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Bob G on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- arn on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Gordon Vigurs on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- arn on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Gordon Vigurs on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
More Cheating Down Under
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
I wonder what an “airpor” is? Looks like they’ve turned the data upside down.
This one has to be a record-setter! More than 2 degrees bogus “past-cooling”
The staggering thing is that they seem to feel no risk of being discovered – or no concern about penalties.
Ai-yai!
I’d have to dig back through to get exactly which stations, but the USHCN has some “adjusted” by 6°. I’m sure it’s sound science, though.
Steve,
I’d be interested to see what they’ve done to Rio, given this:
http://www.ecowho.com/foia.php?file=0018.txt
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/02/21/gavin-wins-the-2014-world-cup-of-data-tampering-in-brazil/
Hmmm, there you go. This is also interesting. Re: New Zealand, even the witch-doctors didn’t have a clue why their temperatures changed from CRUTEM2 to CRUTEM3:
http://www.ecowho.com/foia.php?file=0279.txt
This is also interesting, from Phil Jones in 2008:
Australia is an interesting example. Here exposure issues before the mid-1910s
are an issue to developing much longer series. Most of the Australian provinces
did not introduce Stevenson screens until this time, so their records before the
change are too warm. NZ in contrast put Stevenson screens into operation at all
their sites in the 1870s, so their series are much longer and homoegeneous
throughout. Neville Nicholls knows how to adjust the Australian sites before about 1915,
but can’t get anyone interested in supporting the work there.
http://www.ecowho.com/foia.php?file=4860.txt&search=australia
Maybe they found someone interested in supporting the work?
That could be my bad. A couple of weeks ago on this blog, I pointed out to one of the trolls,(climate something?) that Darwin and Broome airports had no warming in the GISS temperature record over 100 years. Now they have magically adjusted it to be a 2.5 degree rise? That is just pathetic.
On the plus side, there still has been no warming since 1960.
I wonder if the fraudsters can explain that.
Exactly.
Nice…back to Darwin…this post woke me up to the scam…and was how i discovered WUWT!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/08/the-smoking-gun-at-darwin-zero/
Darwin has had a SS since at least 1890.
http://www.warwickhughes.com/papers/ozstev943.gif
Steve, do you have the GISS site for Darwin’s raw temp? I get an ‘access denied’ when I try.
Anto
This is my NZ favourite.
Wellington (raw – v1)
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=507934360010&dt=1&ds=1
Wellington (adj – v4)
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=507934360010&dt=1&ds=14
Here is Darwin –
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=501941200004&dt=1&ds=1
Thanks, Steve.
Now the raw data has been archived by GISS, it is difficult to find the original v1 sites (I have been
building up a number of these to show my ‘warmest friends’).
Darwin is a good case as it did have an SS pre-1900. The station moved from the PO to the AP after being bombed by the Japanese in World War 2.