Shock News : The People In The White House Are Dishonest

9 Responses to Shock News : The People In The White House Are Dishonest

1. Sundance says:

   February 8, 2014 at 12:29 pm

   Cliff Mass a climate scientist that worked with Carl Sagan and Stephen Schneider, completely debunked the “warm causes cold” and in comments had this to say about the video put out by the White House science advisor John Holdren.

   “I cannot believe why Holdren, the President’s Science Adviser, would put out such an ill-informed video. Completely undercuts his credibility as a scientists. Kind of sad really…cliff”
   – January 8, 2014 at 10:25 PM –

   “Stupid is as stupid does” seems to be the new policy theme adopted by the Obama Regime on climate.

   Reply
   • omanuel says:

     February 8, 2014 at 1:14 pm

     John Holdren’s job is to maintain the illusion of honest US government science in the face of overwhelming evidence that public scientific and educational institutions are accepting public funds to deceive the public.

     The integrity of constitutional government and scientific research were sacrificed to save the world from possible nuclear annihilation in <b1945 when it was agreed to Unite Nations, to rule people with hysterical rhetoric, and to hide information on the abundant source of energy that powers our beautiful, bountiful, benevolent universe from the cores of:

     <bHeavy atoms like Uranium
     Some planets like Jupiter
     Ordinary stars like the Sun
     Galaxies like the Milky Way

     https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf

     The corruption of science was first exposed when Climategate emails revealed manipulation of data to fit a political agenda in Nov2009, . . .

     http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2014/02/04/a-historical-perspective-on-hysterical-rhetoric/

     . . . Yet most critics (except Donna Lafamboise) could not then, and will not now, believe that NASA, DOE, EPA, and other federal research agencies were manipulating observations and data to fit the UN’s agenda, although President Eisenhower specifically warned of this threat to our form of government in Jan 1961:

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOLld5PR4ts

     With deep regrets,
     – Oliver K. Manuel
     Former NASA Principal
     Investigator for Apollo

     cc: Congressional Space Science & Technology Committee staff

     PS – If you doubt my conclusions, try for yourself to get any member of the UN’s IPCC, the UK’s Royal Society, the US or any other National Academy of Sciences, or the Swedish or Norwegian Nobel Prize Committee to publicly address three figures of precise experimental data (Figures 1-3, pages 19-27, my autobiography) that falsify standard post-1945 models of stars and nuclei.

     https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf

     Reply
     • Robertv says:

       February 8, 2014 at 6:12 pm

       We are in the calm before the storm moment. We all know that something big is going to happen but we don’t know what .

       Reply
     • Robertv says:

       February 8, 2014 at 6:49 pm

       http://youtu.be/vxgJCqD0pQ8

       ?

       Reply
     • Brian H says:

       February 12, 2014 at 6:03 am

       Thread bomber.

       Reply
2. Bob Greene says:

   February 8, 2014 at 1:22 pm

   They are on a mission to save the planet and you want to niggle about the fine details like tilted axes. 🙂

   Reply
3. stewart pid says:

   February 8, 2014 at 1:47 pm

   My dad used to say that figures don’t lie but liars figure and that applies here in spades!

   Reply
4. Gail Combs says:

   February 8, 2014 at 2:33 pm

   Since this blog does not swing left, you might want to read this to get a glimpse into how the Left mind works. It explains why there is so much emphasis on a ‘Consensus’ and why objective reality is completely ignored.

   From the point of view of the left. “If I wish real hard and click my heels three times it will be true.”

   This also explains why society has moved to no corporal (or other) punishment and wrapping kids in cotton batting. It effectively muffles the learning of actions have consequences and replaces it with if I scream loud enough Mommy/Daddy will do what I want. This shows the difference of Tea Party vs Occupy Wall Street in pictures

   The Philosophy Of Karl Marx
   The philosophical bases of Marx’s thought were laid early and remained unchanged throughout his life. As a student, Marx accepted the philosophy of Hegel as the only sound and adequate explanation of the universe. According to this philosophy, “the only immutable thing is the abstraction of movement.” The one universal phenomenon is change, and the only universal form of this phenomenon is its complete abstraction. Thus, Hegel accepted as real only that which existed in the mind. Objective phenomena and events were of no consequence; only the conceptions of them possessed by human minds were real. Ideas, not objects, were the stuff of which the universe was made.

   In the Hegelian philosophy no idea could exist without an opposite. Thus, the idea of light could not exist unless there were an idea of darkness, nor truth without falsity, nor high without low. If an idea were labeled a thesis, its opposite would be its antithesis. Consequently, in this realm of the mind within which the universe had its only real existence, innumerable theses and antitheses existed. Struggle or conflict was the en-evitable fact… In this struggle thesis and antithesis acted and reacted on each other, and a new phenomenon—synthesis—was created. All action or change occurring in the universe was, under the Hegelian philosophy, the product of thesis, antithesis, and resulting synthesis—all in the realm of ideas, since objective reality could exist only in that sphere. Since this process was universal and never ending, it offered a complete explanation of the causal processes creating all phenomena within the universe….

   Reply
5. Russell Cook (@questionAGW) says:

   February 8, 2014 at 4:35 pm

   Holdren had his other problems relating to the White House years back, too: “White House Involved in Warmist Smear Campaign” http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/11/white_house_involved_in_warmist_smear_campaign.html

   Reply