Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
80 Years Ago : 117 Degrees In The Midwest
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Thanks, Steven, for this reminder of information our government now wants to hide from the public.
George Orwell knew what was coming in 1946, when he moved from London to the Scottish Isle of Jura to start writing “Nineteen Eighty-Four.”
He had already written “Animal Farm” about the rise of totalitarian communism under Stalin before WWII, but somehow he knew Stalin had acquired the ability to subvert western democracies and the rest of the world too after the end of WWII.
Steve,
The most popular cause of extreme weather phenomenon was apparently debunked in 1935.
“In fact, a single cause, the wide use of radio, is often advanced for both
drought and flood.”
US Weather Bureau scientist Dr Humphries denied that radio is the cause, but says that lighting huge fires could break the 1934 drought. Climate science has advanced so much – not.
“This method, Dr. Humphreys says, is correct in principle, but the cost of a fire big enough to break a drought would be prohibitive.”
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/150268556