Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
Recent Comments
- Luigi on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- GW on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Robertvd on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Paul Homewood on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- arn on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Bob G on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- arn on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Independent on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Mac on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- conrad ziefle on Latest Climate News
80 Years Ago : 117 Degrees In The Midwest
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Thanks, Steven, for this reminder of information our government now wants to hide from the public.
George Orwell knew what was coming in 1946, when he moved from London to the Scottish Isle of Jura to start writing “Nineteen Eighty-Four.”
He had already written “Animal Farm” about the rise of totalitarian communism under Stalin before WWII, but somehow he knew Stalin had acquired the ability to subvert western democracies and the rest of the world too after the end of WWII.
Steve,
The most popular cause of extreme weather phenomenon was apparently debunked in 1935.
“In fact, a single cause, the wide use of radio, is often advanced for both
drought and flood.”
US Weather Bureau scientist Dr Humphries denied that radio is the cause, but says that lighting huge fires could break the 1934 drought. Climate science has advanced so much – not.
“This method, Dr. Humphreys says, is correct in principle, but the cost of a fire big enough to break a drought would be prohibitive.”
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/150268556