Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Latest Research In Climate Science
- UK Sucking Carbon
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
Recent Comments
- gordon vigurs on Latest Research In Climate Science
- gordon vigurs on UK Sucking Carbon
- Bob G on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Tel on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Tel on UK Sucking Carbon
- william on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Bob G on UK Net Zero
- arn on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- conrad ziefle on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Ulric Lyons on Erasing 1921
Steve,
I’d be very interested if you would turn your attention to the oldest continuous temperature record in the world – the CET. The lastest version looks VERY different from some of the graphs which I have seen from around the year 2000, or so:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcet/
Compare the latest version above to this one:
http://climatereason.com/LittleIceAgeThermometers/CentralEngland_UK.html
Where did that come from?
Clicking thru Anto’s 2nd link finds a link to Prof Ole Humlum:
http://climatereason.com/UHI/
and the link for the data from Hadley Center:
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/data/download.html
The second one? Ole Humlum, I believe. Hadley changed from reporting monthly means to daily means a little while ago. That allowed them to say the pre-1772 data was not available/unreliable. However, it has also changed the slope of the increase from almost flat to somewhat hockey-stick shaped.
Their UHI adjustments are mere lipservice, as you’d expect. They apply -0.1C to maxima and -0.2C to minima.
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/ParkerHorton_CET_IJOC_2005.pdf
Steven, Auto is referring to the DOCTORED, computer changeling data from the corrupt Met Office in England that has miscalled the weather repeatedly and said children would have no idea what snow is.
It is worse than NOAA and NASA data tampering, as you have proven in the past.
The second graph is the raw data with not computer changes, thanks, Auto!