Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
- “Decades Of Scientific Research”
- The Atlantic : Tesla Bombings Not Politics Or Terrorism
- Tough Times For Eco-Terrorists
- EV Mandates
- “Oswald is a patsy. They set him up”
- In This House We Believe In Science
- “BEAUTIFUL, CLEAN COAL”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Net Zero In China
- Bob G on Net Zero In China
- conrad ziefle on Net Zero In China
- william on Make America Healthy Again
- arn on Make America Healthy Again
- Gerald Machnee on Grok Defending Climategate
- dearieme on Nobel Prophecy Update
- Russell Cook on Make America Healthy Again
- Allan Shelton on Make America Healthy Again
- Bill Odom on Net Zero In China
California Was Much Hotter A Century Ago
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Steve,
I’d be very interested if you would turn your attention to the oldest continuous temperature record in the world – the CET. The lastest version looks VERY different from some of the graphs which I have seen from around the year 2000, or so:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcet/
Compare the latest version above to this one:
http://climatereason.com/LittleIceAgeThermometers/CentralEngland_UK.html
Where did that come from?
Clicking thru Anto’s 2nd link finds a link to Prof Ole Humlum:
http://climatereason.com/UHI/
and the link for the data from Hadley Center:
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/data/download.html
The second one? Ole Humlum, I believe. Hadley changed from reporting monthly means to daily means a little while ago. That allowed them to say the pre-1772 data was not available/unreliable. However, it has also changed the slope of the increase from almost flat to somewhat hockey-stick shaped.
Their UHI adjustments are mere lipservice, as you’d expect. They apply -0.1C to maxima and -0.2C to minima.
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/ParkerHorton_CET_IJOC_2005.pdf
Steven, Auto is referring to the DOCTORED, computer changeling data from the corrupt Met Office in England that has miscalled the weather repeatedly and said children would have no idea what snow is.
It is worse than NOAA and NASA data tampering, as you have proven in the past.
The second graph is the raw data with not computer changes, thanks, Auto!