Democratic Fraud From Michael Mann And Phil Jones

According to Democrat AG’s, hiding critical climate information is fraud. That is exactly what Phil Jones and Michael Mann did.

From: Phil Jones. To: Many. Nov 16, 1999

“I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie, from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.”

Michael Mann hid the post-1960 decline in the temperatures, as measured by Briffa in his paleoclimate studies. Mann claimed that the decline didn’t match the surface temperature record, and simply erased it.


briffa_recon.gif (420×320)

Under the Democratic definition of fraud, Mann is culpable for hiding data. But it gets much worse – because his justification was also scientifically unsupportable. As of 1974, NCAR showed the decline in surface temperatures, which Mann claimed didn’t exist.


14 Jul 1974, Page 1 – at

As of 1978, NOAA also showed the decline in both surface and radiosonde temperatures.



Angell NOAA 1978

NASA has since erased the decline, making themselves culpable under the Democratic definition of fraud.


In 1974, the government’s top climatologist reported the cooling which Mann and NASA erased.

2016-06-05 11 28 16

9 Oct 1974, Page 25 – The Pittsburgh Press at

In 1975, Steven Schneider at NCAR reported the cooling which Mann and NASA erased.


June 2, 1975 – The armadillos are heading south | Chicago Tribune Archive

Climate scientists have been exaggerating and hiding data for decades. Under the Democratic definition, they are committing fraud.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Democratic Fraud From Michael Mann And Phil Jones

  1. Andy DC says:

    These so called climate scientists must think we are all complete idiots to have missed the 1940-1080 cooling that many of us lived through. Bobby Kennedy, Jr. in particular, saying the 1960’s winters were the norm, when in fact they were an anomaly.

    • Jason Calley says:

      Hey Andy! The so-called climate scientists are betting on us ALL being complete idiots. They are simple betting that the number of idiots is high enough to shout down the non-idiots.

      If it were not for the internet, I think they would have succeeded.

      (Having said that, let me say a big “THANK YOU” to Tony Heller. Seriously, a hundred years from now, researchers into the CAGW scam will be saying, “Wow! That Heller guy was a darn bulldog! Why didn’t people pay more attention to him sooner?”)

      • Jason Calley says:

        Blast! A substantive typo: “The so-called climate scientists are betting…” should be: “The so-called climate scientists are NOT betting…”

  2. Hitler used phrenology to prove that Jews and Gypsies were inferior, and killed scientists who denied this true science.

    Stalin used horticulture to prove that Lysenko was right about all plants being genetically equal, and killed all deniers.

  3. oldbrew says:

    Nobody is going to make serious money by chasing climate scientists through the courts.

    Acting against oil companies on the other hand….

    • Rud Istvan says:

      But serious money can be made chasing the equally misleading statements of WWF, FoE, Al Gore about things like polar bears and Arctic late summer ice, the economics of intermittent renewables, and the imaginary dangers of fracking.

  4. RickS says:

    In the old days, we would line up these SOB’s and shoot’m !

    This is nothing less than treason !!!


  5. Eliza says:

    looks like UK will leave European union very good for AGW at last!!!!

  6. Eliza says:

    Science wins thank you SG joke hahah

  7. Eliza says:

    UK will leave the EU. think it is now certain Trump will definitely be next US president and there will be no further climate change HAHAHA. BTW I do not think that Mann ect should be persecuted just leave them alone

  8. OrganicFool says:

    This is what Communists do best. Just like how Obama removed his card-carrying Communist “mentor” (Father?) Frank Marshall Davis from the audio version of his book.

  9. dp says:

    Wasn’t the grain price hike caused by selling too much wheat to Russia aka the Russian Grain Deal?

    Ignoring the source since they’re not the source of the information,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *