1976 : “climatologists can offer no scientific proof to back up their theories”

Forty years ago, climatologists said that global cooling was making the weather berserk.

Climatologists Forecast Stormy Economic Future

The weather seems to have gone berserk lately. The tennis courts at Wimbledon in England have not been as parched since the 1920’s. The same is true for croplands in northern France, the Soviet Union, Minnesota and the Dakotas. It’s so dry, brush fires have started several weeks early in California, and water is being rationed.

As a result, Dr. Browning and other previously ignored climatologists are getting a lot of attention. Projections that they made years ago appear to be coming true.

They believe that the earth’s climate has moved into a cooling cycle, which means highly erratic weather for decades to come

When climatologists were predicting global cooling, actual scientists said :

climatologists can offer no scientific proof to back up their theories

“It’s interesting,” said one skeptical scientist. “But some of their stuff is right out of fantasy land.”

Climatologists Forecast Stormy Economic Future – The New York Times

Nothing has changed, except for the fact that the scamsters changed the name from global cooling to global warming. They are still just as clueless and dishonest as they were when they were making money off the global cooling scam.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to 1976 : “climatologists can offer no scientific proof to back up their theories”

  1. Eric Simpson says:

    A Politicized Science Gone Awry

    Richard Lindzen of MIT said that “climatology” was until the 1990s considered a lowly field for those that do things like “tabulate govt weather data.” Instead, those that dealt seriously with climate were Atmospheric Scientists, Oceanographers, Meteorologists etc.

    But in the early 1990s the leftists took over the climatology section of higher education and *flooded* it with cash, and lowly climatologists were elevated to be the new know-it-all gurus.

    Yet, one thing we can be sure of: when the numbers of climatologists were expanded through the roof in the 1990s ~ ALL of the new draftees were mediocre leftist lackeys like Michael Mann whose only goal was furthering “the cause.”

    And since the 1990s NO ONE could break through into higher education unless you agreed with the alarmists. This makes it academic (useless) to try to quantify any supposed AGW “consensus” in higher education, as the politicized science of climatology is TOTALLY biased by leftist pre-selection.

    Question to Dr. Richard Lindzen:
    Is it possible for a young person today to get tenure in one of these institutions (universities) if they disagree with global warming alarmism?

    Lindzen: … NOT OPENLY.

    See 45 minute mark of: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=so3ELA7NpVw%5D

  2. Andy DC says:

    The global warming cash cow is about to run dry. Neither the atmosphere or the politics are cooperating.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.