December Brings Even More Spectacular Data Tampering From Gavin Schmidt

I generated this graph on November 16, 2016. Note that all three lines intersected at the year 2000.

screen-shot-2016-11-13-at-10-06-39-pm

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

In today’s version of the same graph, Gavin’s fraudulent green line has been pushed up even further. It is now above the satellite data at the year 2000.

screen-shot-2016-12-04-at-6-19-53-pm

The overlay below shows how Gavin has bumped up his fake data even higher than last month.

screen-shot-2016-12-05-at-3-55-52-am

This follow a continuing pattern of Gavin tampering with temperature data month after month, which has caused global warming to nearly triple since the year 2000 – during a time when satellites show little or no warming.

nasa-2000-2012-2016-1

Data.GISS: GISTEMP HISTORY

Gavin is a major player in the biggest science fraud in history.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to December Brings Even More Spectacular Data Tampering From Gavin Schmidt

  1. Steve Case says:

    Colorado University does the same thing with sea level:

    • Ophelia says:

      I have a couple questions/comments about this plot.
      1) Per the source of the data, it appears that for 2004/2005 the plots state “Seasonal Signals Removed” where the data for 2006 onward don’t. Does this account for some of the discrepancy between the two methods?

      2) It would be helpful to readers to see the error bars on these measurements to understand the discrepancy. Given that each sea level measurement is +-4mm, the uncertainty on your rates of sea level can be easily made from error propagation and knowledge of your choice of numerical derivative. If you did a simple difference for example: x_{n+1}-x_n/t_{n+1}-t_{n}, this should be Sqrt(2)*4mm/(t_{n+1}-t_{n})

  2. kyle_fouro says:

    Tony,

    What can the average joe do to bring more exposure to this? Seems like a David versus Goliath on steroids type situation? How do we approach those who doubt that all this is going on?

    Thanks

  3. Steve Case says:

    You know what Tony?
    They think no one will notice.

    CU is due for an updated release and will likely bring Jason3 data on line. I expect a the rate to be downjusted for the ’90s and upjusted for 2016.

    Oh — Great find!

  4. AndyG55 says:

    Is it just GISS?

    Early 2015 I downloaded RSS and have been updating it month by month.

    Today I re-downloaded RSS and calculated the changes from the data I had from earlier. See Graph.

    For example, for the peak of the El Nino in February, the old data had 0.974

    It now has 0.993..

    No change to Oct, Nov values yet.

    There may be a reasonable explanation for these changes, if so, I’d sort of like to know.

  5. ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N says:

    Tony wins the prize for best named chart labels.. :)

  6. charles nelson says:

    There is a kind of fatal ‘last ditch’ thing going on with Warmists right now.
    They kinda know it’s all over…not just because of Trump, but because ordinary people are worn out with hearing the hype but seeing no meaningful Climate Change.
    So it seems their attitude is…why not ramp it up?…go out with a bang so to speak?!

  7. AndyG55 says:

    Slightly OT, but Willis on WUWT shows CruTemp having a drop of nearly 1.2ºC since the El Nino peak.

  8. ed K+ says:

    I was looking at Candian ice report for Hudson Bay and it is quite different than the National Snow and Ice data center….seems that Canada’s Sat sees ice where NSIDC does not…

  9. Of COURSE the fraud graphs split from facts at 2000. It was in the Y2k election that Green econazi votes amounted to 5x the vote gap between the Republicans getting jobs and subsidies and the Dems LOSING jobs and subsidies. The Dems went into high gear incorporating Green dogma into their platform. The dogma was picked up on by formerly funded ex-scientists and amplified into what you see. The graph demonstrates the data-changing and law-changing effect of small-party spoiler votes. It is the best demonstration I’ve yet seen of the phenomenon.

  10. Ian G says:

    This is an example of the fraud you talk about.
    Here is the GISS map of Sep 2016 which clearly shows the state of NSW’s (Australia) mean temp being above average. (I have even given the same year-based anomaly period that the BoM in Australia uses (i.e. 1961-1990)).
    http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/maps/
    Yet, according to the BoM, NSW’s Sep mean temp was below average.
    http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/climate/change/timeseries.cgi?graph=tmean&area=nsw&season=09&ave_yr=0
    This is a difference of around 0.5C.
    I’m sure others can find examples of this ‘shading technique’ fraud around their areas.

  11. TA says:

    I guess Gavin is going to be lying about the temperatures to the very end.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Gavin is no doubt hoping the Social Justice Warriors who are threatening Electors and Jill Stein’s shenanigans will give the election to Hillary instead of Trump.

      The skuttlebutt is fifteen Electors have decided to vote for Hillary despite their state being won by Trump.

      Given the well known fact that the democrats cheat in a variety of ways, stealing the election will not go down well. Seems Soros and his buddies really want a civil war exploding in this country no matter who ends up as president.

      Of course that has always been the goal only they hoped to get rid of the 2nd Amendment and free speech first. Looks like they will take what they can get.

      … Many Americans left Russia after diplomatic service or service in the Creel Committee with a clear-eyed understanding of what the Bolsheviks were all about….

      One who observed and understood was the Creel Committee foreign educational section member, and future dean of Teachers College, William R. Russell. He was in Russia soon after the Bolsheviks seized power and spent considerable time there, working on Creel propaganda against the Germans, for the Bolsheviks, and later against the Bolsheviks.

      Russell described how he saw the communist tradecraft:

      The way they worked their way to the seizure of power was as follows: Talk about peace, talk about social equality, especially among those most oppressed. Talk about organization of labor, and penetrate into every labor union. Talk on soapboxes. Publish pamphlets and papers. Orate and harangue. Play on envy. Arouse jealousy. Separate class from class. Try to break down the democratic processes from within. Accustom the people to picketing, strikes, mass meetings. Constantly attack the leaders in every way possible so that the people will lose confidence. Then in time of national peril, during a war, on the occasion of a great disaster, or of a general strike, walk into the capital and seize the power. A well-organized minority can work wonders.

      Willing Accomplices: How KGB Covert Influence Agents Created Political Correctness and Destroyed America by Kent Clizbe

      Gee, doesn’t that sound familiar?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.