NOAA has a network of 1200 temperature stations around the US, known as USHCN (United States Historical Climatology Network) The measured temperature data shows that US temperatures peaked in the 1930s, and have generally declined since then. But NOAA does not report the measured data to the public, rather they report fake “adjusted” data which shows a lot of warming.
The adjustments create a hockey stick of warming, which accounts for essentially all claimed warming in the US temperature record.
NOAA has been rapidly losing temperature data, and now less than 50% of the stations report each month. When this happens, NOAA simply makes up fake temperatures for that station, which allows them to generate any result they want.
Climate scientists and modelers use this fake data as the basis of their fake models and fake research, and in turn generate fake scientific reports and verify them with fake peer-review. This fake research then becomes the basis for fake government policy and fake journalism.
I’m so jaded from their data manipulations, If NOAA said the sky is blue, I’d walk outside and look up and verify it first.
Seems like the US is well covered with temp stations-
“WMO is committed to further enhancing weather
and climate services and related research. But
in addition to promoting scientific progress,
WMO recognizes the need to build operational
climate services that support climate resilience
and adaptation. Some 70 countries around the
world do not have the capabilities they need
to generate and apply climate information and
forecasts with the required timeliness and
quality of service’
Unfortunately all this fake data results in very real, and destructive, government policies.
I could not agree more. But for the many who think “so what?”, the destructive impact is vast:
The fake data are used as justification for policy all over the world, most destructively by the most zealous defenders of acting now to protect the future of the human race against CO2. The US has a global responsibility to provide truthful data, given the enormous global economic impact of the implementers’ actions. The simplest impact is unnecessarily high costs of electric power, which hurts the poorest the most. Not to mention the human misery of those who live too close to wind “farms” or “parks”. Clever name for that, parks.
The most zealous implementation is essentially mandates of malinvestment using tax revenues plus debt (future tax revenues) to reward those who invest in solar and wind energy (primarily), with guaranteed government subsidies. This draw on tax revenues essentially prevents needed investment in such things as infrastructure, urban renewal, and general economic-activity-driven job creation. Very very sad.
Instead of apologizing to the world for having burned more than our fair share of hydrocarbon and coal, we should be working to expose the true historical record, and right the wrongs of the recent past temperature history manipulation.
Bravo to Tony Heller for his persistence in displaying the truth. One can only hope it will be heard, and that our leaders will act honorably.
Worst part is the models might be right….but we will never know because they are tuned to the fake data and oddly enough, show almost exactly the rate of warming the fake data shows. Which does not match reality at all…..
The only adjustments that should be made are down, according to the Climate Reference Network Rating Guide (see http://www.surfacestations.org/ ). The last citing data (2012) show that over 60% of stations are cited near enough to a heat source (e.g., parking lot) to have reported temperatures reduced by 2°C to correct them. Posts like this one clearly show that NOAA has gone in the opposite direction, violating guidelines, at the very least…
Yes, you take stations away from the Urban Heat Island and untampered by phony “adjustments”, there has been virtually no warming since 1940.
And there is the problem because most progressives live in an Urban Heat Island .
It is like a little slice of bizzaro world. Take the average person, stick them in a room and ask them what the temperature of the room is. Very few people will be able to tell you what the temperature is within a degree or two. And yet those same people will tell you that they have personally observed that “the summers are hotter than they used to be!” They will tell you that they can personally feel the difference between a childhood climate and a more recent climate that averages one degree warmer.
Madness!
Fake data…..but lots of very real government grants.
With borrowed money digging the hole deeper and deeper creating a fake economic recovery.
Shout it from the roof-tops, brother.
Here’s a chart I hadn’t seen before.
The difference between GISS and the 1975 NAS chart.
Half of warming is definitely man made, i.e. fabricated.
Would love to know exactly how that chart changed; what stations were used for bot, what ajustments were made, etc…
If global warming makes it warmer….and warmer makes more and stronger hurricanes
Then someone at NOAA had got some ‘splaining to do.
because ACE would then show, in spite of all the adjustments, temps have dropped
http://notrickszone.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/ACE-Global-2015.png
Does BEST use USHCN?
Of course. The USHCN temperature record is the only half-way decent temperature record on Earth covering a large area. Global temperatures are fake.
‘In stunning testimony, under oath, before the U.S. House of Representatives House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, John Beale, a former executive of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revealed the EPA’s goal is to “modify the DNA of Capitalism.” Put another way, the entire “Global Warming” crusade has been a complete lie from the start — to attack the free market system — and the people telling this lie KNEW it was a lie when they started telling it! This former EPA executive is now on his way to jail.’ -Turner Radio Network, Jan. 22, 2014
..and he served actual time in the slam. -mongoos
alright, i’m a dummy when it comes to ftp. can someone help me understand how i can actually open this data up? gotta use it for some citations, not quite sure how to get at it.