Science 1974 : Global Cooling To Starve Millions

The National Center for Atmospheric Research is America’s official government climate laboratory. I live just below NCAR and ride my bike up there very frequently. NCAR is currently headed by global warming scamster Kevin Trenberth, but in 1974 they were headed by global cooling scamster Steven Schneider – who said global cooling was going to make the weather unstable and starve millions. Trenberth now says global warming will make weather unstable and starve millions.

12 Jun 1974, Page 20 – at

The only millions they actually care about is $$$$$$ – and they raise it by extorting the public with snake oil schemes about climate. In 1975 they wanted money to stop global cooling by melting the Arctic.


Now they want to block the sun to stop global warming, and say “we have no choice.”

Blocking out the sun to fight global warming: Bob McDonald – Technology & Science – CBC News

Global warming scamsters insist that the global cooling scare never happened, because their scam depends on rewriting the past.

National Geographic : 1976 Nov, Page 594

These people are complete nut cases. They need to be called out and removed from any position where they can do damage to others.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Science 1974 : Global Cooling To Starve Millions

  1. Steve Case says:

    Our friends on the left argue that the 1970s “Global Cooling” scare was a myth. But I was around in the ’70s and “Global Cooling” was in the news and “Global Warming” wasn’t.

    Two great sources for 1970s Global Cooling links:

    On “Steve Goddard’s” Old board:
    Real Science – 1970s Global Cooling Scare

    And from the “No Tricks Zone”

    Massive Cover-up Exposed: 285 Papers From 1960s-’80s Reveal Robust Global Cooling Scientific ‘Consensus’

    • Menicholas says:

      During the early to mid eighties I was in college, and during those early years my areas of principle interest were geology, including earth history, and physical geography, including meteorology and climatology.
      I know for sure that it was real because I was in classes every day for years in which the topic was discussed and debated.

    • Menicholas says:

      Scientists and educators were very much aware of the by-then very old idea of CO2 increases causing some warming, but the idea had long since been examined and discarded.
      In fact, the first person to raise the idea widely was Svante Arrhenius (considered by most to be the founder of the branch of science called physical chemistry), although he considered it from the point of view that more CO2 would be the best thing that could happen because not only was a warmer earth desirable, but CO2 fertilization would be a boon for agriculture.
      Back then, everyone knew that warmer was better, what with the Little Ice Age fresh on everyone’s mind.
      The idea that warm was bad took some special brand of brainwashing, that was apparently not devised until the late twentieth century. Either that or people are just getting stupider.
      Even he knew though, by the second decade of the twentieth century, that he had been mistaken.

  2. Tim Erickson says:

    Things like this are why I don’t cry if science gets its research money cut. All they are doing is chasing the research money that is tied to whatever is “sexy” at the time.

  3. Kris Johanson says:

    “These people are complete nut cases”
    After reading the Newsweek piece, I would add “major control freaks”.

  4. Menicholas says:

    It should not go unsaid that Schneider was an equal opportunity scamster…he hopped right on board the global warming panic-mongering when it was ramping up, changing his tune 180 degrees almost overnight.
    The only things he really knew how to do very well were to exaggerate, and to scare the weak minded.

  5. Greg Burton says:

    So, the globalists attempting to depopulated the planet, are pushing the global warming scam to implement decarbonization, which will reduce photosynthesis plant by-products, the basis for planetary food production, which could lead to food shortages and starvation (depopulation).

    In the event the planet is going into a Maunder Minimum, any lowered temperatures would bring about carbon sequestration, which would lower available carbon (CO2), making any affects of decarbonization that much more significant.

    So, putting on my tin-foil hat, might I query whether the global warming, globalist, AOC, #GreenNewDeal, Bolshevik crowd may know all this and are deliberately continuing to flog the global warming decarbonization fraud just to make the depopulation affects that much more dystopian that they already could be?

    Please, oh please dear UN, save us from the Cheeto-man and his minions of deplorables!

  6. Camella Manors says:

    An overall very informative blog, this will really help in similar endeavors I am doing personally and for my company.

    Condo in the Philippines

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *