Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming! Please help with a gift by clicking the button below.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- arn on Abiogenic Oil?
- arn on “It Is Possible”
- Jimmy Haigh on “It Is Possible”
- John B on The Safe Climate Of 1931
- Gordon Vigurs on Abiogenic Oil?
Archives
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Climate Mafia Strikes Again : This Time With Satellite Sea Level Data
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Thanks again.
Are you watching Juventus – Barcelona tonight yo get some distraction from all the scientific dishonesty ?
No, but this two second sequence is pretty funny
CU’s Sea Level Research Group
http://sealevel.colorado.edu/
has yet to update their website to the changes alluded to in the Scientific American article. When they do the chart below will get an update to see what those changes amount to. So far since their “#version _2004rel1.2” they’ve made numerous changes accumulating to what you see in their “#version_2016rel4”
Had no changes ever been made, the two plots would have fallen on top of each other. Plotting the rate of sea level rise as a derivative of the raw data removes the requirement to line the two plots up at a common beginning. However the small sample size for the early data points includes too much noise distortion so the plots start at the three year point of 1995. Each data point represents the rate of sea level rise since the start in late 1992.
When “#version_2017rel1” finally is published it will be very interesting to see what changes are made. How well will it fall on top of the 2016 release? Will the high point around January 2006 still be there? Or will a much more recent date be shown as the highest overall rate.
The most ‘entertaining’ part is the dailymail article in this vid,where scientist claim that :”New York&London would be underwater within decades”
(the article is from june 2016)
and than writing
“scientists say devastating climate change will take place sooner than that thought”
(Hansen predicted in 1988 New York to be underwater within decades)
There is no “sooner” as the three decades are over.
There’s just a later-a much much later obviously as the predicted scenarios do not happen((outside of faked statistics))
and ‘normal’ anomalies worldwide are (cherrypicked,the cold ones are ignored)missused and blown out of proportion and presented as the second coming of an armageddon though there never was a first one.
Why is NASA satellite sea level data not being updated? The last entry is for July 2017 and then there’s nothing.