IPCC – Blaming Junk Science On CO2

In 2007, the IPCC made a completely baseless claim that Himalayan Glaciers will be gone by 2035 – and they blamed their fraud and malfeasance on CO2.

AR4 WGII Chapter 10: Asia – 10.6.2 The Himalayan glaciers

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to IPCC – Blaming Junk Science On CO2

  1. Anon says:

    Hi Tony,

    I was just wondering, has it ever occurred to these so called “researchers” that the Chinese (and India) will be taking a hard look at all of these false and inflated stories, predictions and datum in 2030 when they need to make a decision about whether or not to follow through on their Paris Climate Accord commitment to de-carbonize their economy? The Chinese can’t be stupid, so I would practically guarantee they are finding the same holes and problems in the climate science that you are. And to voluntarily alter their booming economy on this flimsy and bogus science would be nuts — and I would expect them to tell the world that in 2030. Then what is the EU and the US going to do? Economic sanctions? It is mind boggling to think about. IMHO

    • Gail Combs says:

      Actually the Paris Accord is falling apart now that “Other People’s Money’ aka the USA tax payer has walled out. U.S. Paid $1 Billion To Paris Agreement Green Fund – All Other Nations Combined $0

      Turkey Retreats From Paris Climate Treaty

      Turkey’s President Recep Erdogan admits the only reason for being in the Paris Climate Treaty was to get money from the U.S. and other more wealthy nations. Now that the U.S. has pulled out of the treaty, there’s no reason to expect the financial benefits.

      Proving yet again, for the eleventyth time, that the entire construct of the Paris Climate Treaty had nothing to do with the actual climate (ie. weather), and everything to do with economic wealth distribution….

      (Reuters) The U.S. decision to pull out of the Paris climate agreement means Turkey is less inclined to ratify the deal because the U.S. move jeopardizes compensation promised to developing countries, President Tayyip Erdogan said on Saturday….
      Erdogan said that when Turkey signed the accord France had promised that Turkey would be eligible for compensation for some of the financial costs of compliance.

      The Bloom is off the Ruse: Germany’s Angela Merkel Quietly Retreating From Paris Climate Treaty

    • Gail Combs says:

      The International banksters and Corporations are NOT happy about President Trump pulling out of the Paris Accord and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, threatening NAFTA and maybe even WTO, shutting down illegal invasion by hostile Third Worlders like La Raza and Islamic Jihadists, thereby killing off their plans for a world government.

      THE PLAN
      The Rockefeller File by Gary Allen
      Published June 28th 1976
      (wwwDOT)whale.to/b/allen_b.html

      The master planners devised the strategy of a merger – a Great Merger – among nations.

      But before such a merger can be consummated, and the United States becomes just another province in a New World Order, there must at least be the semblance of parity among the senior partners in the deal. How does one make the nations of the world more nearly equal?

      The Insiders determined that a two-prong approach was needed; use American money and know-how to build up your competitors, while at the same time use every devious strategy you can devise to weaken and impoverish this country. [See Chasing the Dragon: Clinton’s China Policy for how Clinton implemented this plan. ] The goal is not to bankrupt the United States. Rather, it is to reduce our productive might, and therefore our standard of living, to the meager subsistence level of the socialized nations of the world.

      The plan is not to bring the standard of living in less developed countries up to our level, but to bring ours down to meet theirs coming up… It is your standard of living which must be sacrificed on the altar of the New World Order….

      Much of the spade work for setting up this ploy is being done by Henry Kissinger, who was a personal employee of Nelson Rockefeller for a decade before Rocky placed him in the Nixon Administration….

      This was validated by Pascal Lamy former World Trade Organization Director-General. He indicates that an European Union like super state has been the goal since the 1930s. — (wwwDOT)globalgovernancewatch.org/spotlight_on_sovereignty/lamy-calls-for-europeaninspired-global-governance

      The world is headed toward greater degrees of globalization — deeper integration, wider cooperation and greater sharing of responsibilities. To govern this globalized world, writes World Trade Organization Director-General Pascal Lamy, existing institutions will need to be reformed to ensure they work together optimally.

      Pascal Lamy: Whither Globalization?

      In the same way, climate change negotiations are not just about the global environment but global economics as well — the way that technology, costs and growth are to be distributed and shared…
      Can we balance the need for a sustainable planet with the need to provide billions with decent living standards? Can we do that without questioning radically the Western way of life? …

      Countries claim the right to use national resources as they see fit. But the byproduct can be greenhouse gases or disappearing fish stocks or raw material shortages — which impact the interconnected world we share….

      This raises a final challenge: How to provide global leadership? Mobilizing collective purpose is more difficult when we no longer face one common enemy, but thousands of complex problems
      The reality is that, so far, we have largely failed to articulate a clear and compelling vision of why a new global order matters — and where the world should be headed….

      All had lived through the chaos of the 1930s …including the defeated powers, agreed that the road to peace lay with building a new international order — and an approach to international relations that questioned the Westphalian, sacrosanct principle of sovereignty — rooted in freedom, openness, prosperity and interdependence.
      (wwwDOT)theglobalist.com/storyid.aspx?StoryId=9174

      • Gail Combs says:

        Now we have the latest move. to marginalize President Trump.

        Horsepucky News Courtesy of Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal…

        This stuff is beyond ridiculous at this point. Remember, there are trillions of dollars at stake and all of the vested financial interests, writ large, have positioned themselves to do anything possible to draw down the support for President Trump’s ‘America-First’ agenda.

        Don’t kid yourselves or sell your intelligence short; it ain’t about Donald Trump per se’, the opposition is against the policies of President Donald Trump. Trump’s ‘America-First’ policies are adverse to the interests of multinational corporations and the multinational financial institutions who underwrite those corporations. Yes, this includes Rupert Murdoch, aka “Mr. Wall Street”, the proprietor of the Wall Street Journal and all around self-indulgent billionaire.

        The latest approach is for the Wall Street Journal to write an article about Trump reconsidering pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement based on, wait for it…. the conversations with an “EU official”. Un huh. “International Climate Officials” they say. Ohhh… Journalistic standards now dispatched and not even an inquiry to the White House prior to publication. Go figure. {{{eyeroll}}}….

        And yes per usual the white house refutes this piece of nonsense.

        Sarah Sanders
        ✔ @PressSec

        Our position on the Paris agreement has not changed. @POTUS has been clear, US withdrawing unless we get pro-America terms.
        https://twitter.com/PressSec/status/909168166751883266

  2. Rah says:

    Rex Tillerson started that crap by not being more specific during an interview on Face The Nation. Nothing has changed concerning the Trump’s decision on the so called Paris Accords.

  3. David Falloure says:

    I read a story today (https://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/climate-change/new-study-warns-loss-of-up-to-twothirds-of-himalayas-glaciers/news-story/fd33f42a37b179820029862d10ce262fthat) the glaciers of the Himalyas are melting and could disappear by 2100–which seems to be an extension on the dates in this string. But it also appears to be backed by some real science and a lot of people in the study. I am not a scientist–just a skeptic (I refer to your site a lot). Can you help me understand this?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.