Seth Borenstein Pushing Fake Data Again

Seth Borenstein is one of the top purveyors of fake climate news.

Star-News – Google News Archive Search

The Argus-Press – Google News Archive Search

Now he is pushing fake US temperature data. Note his little hockey stick after 1980.

The graph below shows NOAA data tampering to the US temperature record, which also shows a hockey stick after 1980. The hockey stick is due to massive fraud by government scientists, not climate.

 

As long as government scientists are willing to lie and cheat. Seth is willing to parrot their fake data and fake forecasts..

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Seth Borenstein Pushing Fake Data Again

  1. CheshireRed says:

    What is stopping someone taking NOAA to court to justify their data or explain their adjustments?

    • RAH says:

      Lack of standing?

    • Kent Clizbe says:

      We need a whistleblower. An insider who is privy to the plans, schemes, methods, and personalities involved in the fraud.

      Insiders sharing their knowledge is how all tightly held conspiracies are cracked.

      Just like the Mafia.

      Recruiting an insider is nearly the only way to break the Team.

  2. Advocatus Diaboli says:

    Tony, I suggest you publish a video parading through the long series of failed “scientific” AGW predictions. There’s so much to pick from, with respect to glacial cover, hurricane activity, sea levels — you could have a lot of fun putting it together.

  3. gator69 says:

    The real fraud is that the first chart does not reveal that these are modeled numbers, and not real data. It is fine to alter numbers and produce a chart reflecting those changes, but it is NOT fine to produce charts that leave out this information.

  4. Andy DC says:

    Seth is nothing but a low life parasite that has gotten quite wealthy by lying and whoring for the fake climate change industry.

  5. Rob says:

    Why only go back 30 years? Of that’s right…you need to have your start period after the cooling of the 60s and 70s and (it seems) first half of the 80s. Thirty years is such a huge period too for a planet that we are told is billions of years old.

    I’m tired of the cherrypicking these clowns do.

    Wake me up when the average temperature is increasing every single year (which the data clearly shows is NOT the case by all the zigzagging) in every single area of the world and temperatures finally surpass the record averages of earlier in the 20th century and my winters here in Ontario Canada are like winters in Kingston, Jamaica. There’d be something to talk about if that actually happened.

    I hope the next decade is one of stable cool temps so I can then read about global warming turning into global cooling and then back like it’s Bruce Banner.

  6. Steven Fraser says:

    And, the original tweet has a digit swap. He wrote 1895, when intending his claim to reference 1985.

  7. frederik wisse says:

    Slightly off-topic , but this is reality in Holland now in september 2017 .
    September 16 produced the lowest daily maximum-temperature ever measured here in Holland , 12,9C at DeBilt KNMI-weatherstation. This was a reduction of 0,5C of the previous lowest maximum , which is fairly substantial , especially taken into consideration the often ridiculous changes of measurements propagated by our alarmists for socalled technical reasons. The devil is in the detail , but apparently God appreciates also rough figures .

  8. Wasn’t there something in Michael Crichton’s novel “Jurassic Park” about ex-scientists faking data?

  9. Steven Fraser says:

    Here is an annotation of Tony’s graph of the raw data. I put in the extra decadal numbers, and dotted vertical lines to help in the location of the places where the charted values fall on those decades.

    I also put in .1 degree increments (not perfectly) on the left vertical axis, and put horizontal lines between the 1958 and 1986 values.

    These lines helped me understand that Hansen had to exaggerate to claim ‘From 1 to 2 degrees’ between the two years. Even though he cherry-picked it (starting in 1957 would have made the start value .5 F higher) it still is not in the range Hansen cited, less than 1F The temp change in Celsius is even less impressive: ~.54C.

  10. Steven Fraser says:

    Hmm.. Chart did not make it.

  11. wert says:

    Tony, your graph on final-raw is awesome.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.