An Open Attack On Science By The Press

“If you thought that science was certain – well, that is just an error on your part.”

― Richard Feynman

In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.

  • Galileo Galilei

Because a group of professional climate liars at the IPCC declared themselves to be 95% certain of their lies, four years ago the fake news press cut off any honest or sane discussion about climate.

L.A. Times cuts off climate-change deniers – CBS News

In doing so, the press gave the climate mafia unlimited license to kill science and scientific integrity.

The “world’s top scientists” who wrote the IPCC report, were actually government bureaucrats who rewrote the report to suit their political needs, and deleted any actual science.

Top climate expert’s sensational claim of government meddling in crucial UN report | Daily Mail Online

Global warming is the most dishonest and corrupt junk science in history.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to An Open Attack On Science By The Press

  1. Andy DC says:

    It is hard for most people to grasp that science can be rotten to the core, but you have shown irrefutable evidence that it is. There is not anything on this planet that big money does not corrupt. People with science training love their second homes and private planes as much as anyone else. They also fear ostracism and losing their jobs as much as anyone else.

    • gator69 says:

      Absolute power corrupts absolutely…

      The World Health Organization’s cancer agency dismissed and edited findings from a draft of its review of the weedkiller glyphosate that were at odds with its final conclusion that the chemical probably causes cancer.
      Documents seen by Reuters show how a draft of a key section of the International Agency for Research on Cancer’s (IARC) assessment of glyphosate – a report that has prompted international disputes and multi-million-dollar lawsuits – underwent significant changes and deletions before the report was finalised and made public…

      IARC’s assessment that glyphosate is a probable human carcinogen is an outlier. In the 40 or so years since the weedkiller first came to the market, glyphosate has been repeatedly scrutinized and judged safe to use.


  2. Anon says:

    Just a suggestion:

    The fact that anti-AGW posts and editorials are getting banned is not actually a bad thing. It means that the anti-AGW ideas are in ascendance and that they can’t be deftly refuted or that there are simply too many anti-AGW supporters. So, if your favorite website bans you or deletes / refuses to print you comment it is not a bad thing. It means they can no longer cope. Think about it.

    Also take a look at the number of comments on AGW articles vs non-AGW articles on some of your favorite news sites. You will often see that there are many fewer comments on the AGW articles because many comments are banned or people have given up posting.

    Important: The other point I want to add is that even if you know a comment will be rejected once it is reviewed, I urge people to keep sending them in. This is because the comments are being looked at by actual people and those people are the ones setting the publication policy of the blog / website. You never know when a well presented and well thought-out argument will cause an editor to open their eyes and start looking at AGW more objectively. Remember, these people live in a MSM created bubble and your comment might be the only time they are actually exposed to an alternate point of view. It happened to me, as a former AGW supporter.

  3. Colorado Wellington says:

    For those people who still think this worldwide “global warming” campaign is about “science”, here is one of the “climate scientists” in his own words:

    Climate policy redistributes the world’s wealth

    Climate policy has almost nothing to do anymore with environmental protection, says economist Ottmar Edenhofer. The next world climate summit in Cancún is actually an economic summit about the distribution of the world’s resources.

    Interview: Bernhard Pötter
    Neue Zürcher Zeitung
    14 November, 2010

    The original interview in German can be found here:

    Klimapolitik verteilt das Weltvermögen neu

    Klimaschutz hat mit Umweltschutz kaum mehr etwas zu tun, sagt der Ökonom Ottmar Edenhofer.
    Der nächste Weltklimagipfel in Cancún sei eigentlich ein Wirtschaftsgipfel, bei dem es um die
    Verteilung der Ressourcen gehe.

    Interview: Bernhard Pötter
    Neue Zürcher Zeitung

    Herr Doktor Edenhofer is not just another economist. He is the co-chair of the IPCC Working Group III “Mitigation of Climate Change“ and the WGIII Technical Support Unit (TSU).

    He was part of the core writing team of the IPCC Synthesis Report of the Fifth Assessment Report in 2014.

    The science journal Nature calls Edenhofer The Climate Chairman.

    It is not an accident that Marxists endorsed the whole global warming fraud from the very beginning. Their self-proclaimed goal is a destruction of free societies and their enslavement. After the failure of the Soviet Union, they decided this is their best next bet.

    For a sampling, anyone can type Marxism and Global Warming into their favorite search engine and see how intertwined the two ideologies are.

    Some of you may want to listen to this Marxist view of our world.

    It takes a strong stomach to listen to the grating rant but those who can take it will walk away understanding how much hatred there is on the current Left for the rest of us. The Communist atrocities of the past were driven by the same hate and there is no doubt these people will do it again if given chance.

    The daily media pounding about global warming and climate change is just a means to their very specific ends.

  4. jackson says:

    This is the best climate website by far.
    Even the comments are more educational than other sites.
    Thank-you for the awesome work.

  5. Gerald Machnee says:

    I have already ended my subscriptions to Popular Science and National Geographic.

  6. Arn says:

    When crimes,fascism,lies are the norm,
    than such reactions are the only way the crooks can go to keep
    their lies,crimes,fascism alive.

    It is the only way for the parasite to survive.

    One just need to take a look at the “demographics” of the lefti protesters.
    AGW/gay/feminist/transgender/pro-abortion/pro-islam(and islam is 100% against all four previous groups,and all four previous groups know this 100% for sure) gangsters&killers who protest against those gangsters&killers who protect people from being killed,
    anti gun activist, total perverts who will protect any murderer from death sentence while being 100% for reckless abortions and killing of little babies,
    people who won’t work but want everything,
    people with so little self respect that they can only watch tv and getting fat and then blame others.
    lazy parasitic antifa pricks who don’t mind getting paid by the nazi collaborateur soros who makes his money by destroying foreign currencies
    to impoverish the poorest of the poor so that his superrich corporate billionaire buddies can then infiltrate those countries and buy everything for pennies on a dollar and soros can pay his antifa thugs so that they can buy new smartphones,cars and xboxes.
    and then those thugs who took soros blood money go on the streets protest against poverty and inequality.

    A system with such a high number of parasites and hipocrites can only survive
    that way.

    And the only reason these parasites were able to exist and grow was tolerance
    and money when they were created,
    because at that time when the neobolshevik was created(=hippie/progressive)
    he was created in your country because your country was at that time the most
    tolerant and individual country on this planet-no other country of the 60ies would have tolerated
    the bunch of parasitic pricks on drugs who wanted money for nothing=hippies.

  7. Kris Johanson says:

    That Richard Feynman quote (at top) is a typical good one. That’s from his famous “Lectures on Physics” at Cal Tech, which is full of good pull-quotes like that.

    The Galileo quote is a good one, as well. Here’s a guy who had the audacity to question 2,000 years, basically, of Aristotelian thinking about science. Galileo didn’t have a clock, for instance; he used water dripping from a pan into another pan, and weighed the bottom pan before and after to measure time! He couldn’t drop objects and get accurate time measurements, so he devised an inclined plane with a groove in it and rolled bronze balls down the incline, and using basic Trigonometry deduced the acceleration of gravity that way. Greek (Aristotle) physics was proved wrong after 2000 years of acceptance

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.