A Google search for “top energy and climate specialists in the world” on an iPhone seems to do a very good job. Toto approves.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Recent Comments
- Gator on The February Blizzard Of 1936
- Gator on Climate Glossary
- paul courtney on Picking Cherries In New York Wine Country
- arn on The February Blizzard Of 1936
- Michael Klein on Climate Glossary
Categories
Meta
But it seems like when I Google the name of so called Climate skeptics , the top results are all hit pieces designed to denigrate them . You must be doing something right ! Keep up the good and important work .
Google Steve Goddard and the moniker seems to get off fairly well but for most other reputable scientists (eg Roy Spencer) on the so called “skeptical” side of Climate politics, denigrating links such as ‘desmogblog’ and ‘skepticalscience.com’ links are prominent
Regarding skepticalscience.com which was / is created and maintained by John Cook (97% consensus paper).
The Rise of “Kinder, Gentler” Climate-Change Deniers
John Cook, a professor at George Mason University’s Center for Climate Change Communication who has studied public perception of climate change extensively, believes this type of denial is especially dangerous because it pretends to be balanced—thereby confusing people into apathy. “When you throw conflicting pieces of information at people, they don’t know what to believe, so they stop believing in anything,” he told me.
https://newrepublic.com/article/142421/rise-kinder-gentler-climate-change-deniers
So, that is what you have to keep in mind when you visit skepticalscience.com, “no conflicting pieces of information”.
It seems like Cook’s goals and the title of his website are a contradiction in terms.
I mentioned CAGW in a Chemistry class, and there were quite a few skeptical kids muttering under their breath… so there is hope!
Excellent! Your making progress.
Congrats Tony!
I’ll buy you a beer next time
What the hell is Elon Musk doing in that list?
Yes, but why is Elon Musk ranked higher?
I think that guy should have been put into the seat of that Tesla space junk they launched into space.
Space Junk?
Amazon owner bezos is wasting tons of money on a space travel programm.
Considering how much energy is needed to get to such high altitudes I wonder how he(and MSM) will sell this to the public as co2 neutral/free thing :)
This will be funny.
@truthseeker
Elon Musks cars are considered the future of co2 free driving.
+he is heavily investing in high density battery research.
((but before increasing battery capacities by 400% nothing of this can become really mainstream)
Around here, Tesla’s are high priced status symbols for people who already have a couple Merc’s or Bimmers.
They’re taxpayer subsidized. Do you see a contradiction?…
Tesla and Musks fame only exist because of hypocrisy and contradiction.
A virtue signalling status symbol of the green neo-bourgoisie who can afford paying 3* more for energy and cars.
Awesome.
Btw, weather in W. Washington this February even worse than when you out this way in 2017. Two snow events in the past week, and a few more in the pipeline. As I type this, both major east-west highways are closed in Central Washington due to blizzard conditions and collisions with no estimate of a reopening time. Of course, all of this due to a “warming world.”
Check again next week. My guess is now that Big Brother knows you rate that high, your rank will soon plummet. But I sincerely hope I’m wrong.
that is what I was thinking too!
Awesome Tony! Keep up the good work!
Considering the low number of comments here
this is surprising
but it is a good indicator that the data provided is reliable and shared by many
and that more and more people are fed up with all the AGW crap and are avoiding mainstream sources&opinions more and more.
O/T
I am a frequent visitor and I have a question about long term climate patterns. In addition to climate sites I also enjoy reading archeology sites. This morning I was looking at a story about the area between Alaska and Siberia (Beringia). It got me to thinking about the glacial area of North America. This and past winters heavy cold spells and talk about the ” polar vortex” seems to mirror the known glacial patterns of Canada and the Midwest/ New England areas.
My question is: Do you think that our present weather patterns are the “normal” weather systems of the interglacial period we are in now?
Not sure if I framed the question clearly but aside from warm blips in normal cold weather such as the medieval warm period, Roman warm period,ect. doesn’t this follow the average winter weather of North America?
Would appreciate some guidance to other websites if you don’t have time for an answer.