Another Greenland Hockey Stick

Greenland has gained nearly 100 billion tons of ice so far this month.

SMB_curves_LA_EN_20190415.png (846×1080)

summit:status:webcam

This is coming after two years of near record surface mass gain.

Greenland Gains Huge Amounts Of Ice For The Second Year In A Row | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

This is a big change from the 1930s, when the Greenland ice sheet was losing huge amounts of ice.

18 Nov 1930 – LOCAL AND GENERAL – Trove  h/t AndyOz

17 Dec 1939, Page 15 – Harrisburg Sunday Courier

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Another Greenland Hockey Stick

  1. GW Smith says:

    There is a reason I don’t want to live in Canada.

  2. Bob Hoye says:

    Last fall, the DMI reported that the “melt” season was unusually cool and the albedo was high.
    Same for the previous season of 2017.
    It will be interesting to see what this summer brings to the far North.

  3. Gator says:

    How many Manhattans or Wadhams does that equal?

    • Jason Calley says:

      It’s probably rotten ice anyway…

      Speaking of which, whatever happened to “rotten ice”? For at least a few years that was the big CAGW complaint about the Arctic ice which refused to melt away. “Well, sure, there’s still some ice up there — but it’s all rotten! It’ll be gone by next year…”

  4. Taphonomic says:

    Thanks Tony. I’ve been looking for these graphs since they moved from their previous site. I thought they might have just stopped doing them because of the large accumulations in 2017 and 2018. It’s good to see that they continue to delete graph lines from previous years that show large accumulations while showing the data for 2011-2012 (sarc).

    • Jason Calley says:

      Hey Jim, I only looked at the first link. I have no idea who posted it, but it does not take long to see it is a pure piece of ad hominem rant void of reason or evidence. That said, I had to laugh at one of his reasons showing that Tony is wrong about CAGW:
      “As you can see, (potholer’s) videos enjoyed more viewers and his like/dislike ratio is far better than (Tony’s).”
      It is difficult to imagine any adult reduced to citing YouTube likes and dislikes as evidence for scientific facts. As much as I disagree with potholer’s analysis, it must be embarrassing for him to have that level of supporter. Sigh…

      • Anon says:

        Almost invariably, those types of videos, instead of debunking their intended target, end up as illustrations of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.