Perfect Data Tampering

“With four parameters you can fit an elephant to a curve; with five you can make him wiggle his trunk”

– John von Neumann

Measured US temperature data provides no evidence of warming over the past century, so NOAA alters the data to create the appearance of warming.

The data tampering makes a perfect hockey stick.

And the tampering precisely matches the increase in CO2.

Spreadsheet

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Perfect Data Tampering

  1. Gator says:

    Well they had to be experts at something…

  2. GW Smith says:

    Why do they never respond to you? I think we know.

  3. Tom Abbott says:

    It looks like criminal fraud to me. The damage the Climategate Charlatans have done with their temperature data manipulations is almost unbelievable.

    And they are still hard at it, bastardizing one temperature record after another.

    There will be a reckoning one of these days.

  4. Jason Calley says:

    For anyone who can read a graph, the “adjustments vs year” graph and the “adjustments vs CO2” graph are smoking guns for fraud. Can anyone tell us why (according to the “climate scientists”) the stations had an aggregate average error of one degree too hot a century ago? Can anyone tell us why (according to the “climate scientists”) the stations which had an aggregate average error of zero in 2008, now have an aggregate average error of reading one degree too cold in 2019? Has our technology gotten so much worse in just the last ten years that we have gone from getting correct readings, to now have an error as large as that of a century ago?

  5. Denis Rushworth says:

    If they leave it alone, the CONUS Climate Reference System may eventually put a lie to the alarmism or confirm it. So far, the CRS shows no increase in the 14 years it’s been operating. Should this continue, it’s likely that NOAA will start “adjusting” it soon.

  6. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    Supporting the view that the adjustments are garbage is the snow cover extent.
    Trends completely flat for the last couple of decades.
    Snow cover extent is easy to measure from satellite and represents an isotherm at 0 C, ie the land which is at or below that temperature. If the area hasn’t changed the real temperature hasn’t either.

    You can’t fool snow: it melts at 0 C and ignores fake adjustments.

  7. Brian D says:

    This US reanalysis (1851-2014 20CRV2c) shows nothing abnormal about current temps, just like the raw USHCN data. The US has the best long period temp data, hands down. Global datasets are fabricated garbage, like the final USHCN data.
    https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/cgi-bin/data/testdap/timeseries.pl

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.