CRUTEM3v – August 1850. Phil had one thermometer record for the entire southern hemisphere, and was able to precisely calculate the hemispheric mean temperature anomaly of -1.182
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
Recent Comments
- arn on Angry And Protesting
- Tel on Angry And Protesting
- Bob G on Angry And Protesting
- william on Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- Allan Shelton on Precision Taxation
- arn on Angry And Protesting
- arn on Angry And Protesting
- Russell Cook on Angry And Protesting
- Allan Shelton on Causes Of Earthquakes
- Allan Shelton on Causes Of Earthquakes
It would be amusing to plot the subsequent global temperature using data from only the same grid squares as used in the 1850 plot.
Yeah but Steve Mosher says this is how science is done and he trusts the scientists.
Backed by someone esle that post here! 😆
Else, LMAO!
I fear they’ve developed DRB Syndrome (dirty rotten bastard).
Phil’s buddy Trenberth ran quickly from Stratwarm studies a few years ago and someone needs to ask him why?
This is the same dead-certain teleconnection approach used by the tree-ring fraudsters to estimate global or NH temperatures in centuries past based on a few bristle cone pines in one location in the US Southwest, and assuming stationarity of the relationship between ring width or density and temperature.
Its BAU ‘climate science.’ What’s the problem?
It shows up how poor a technique it is to average temperatures over a geographical area. The temperature of one place is that place’s temperature only. It can not be smeared across a region, as currently done by Hansen et al, to try and give the globe an average temperature, when using fewer and fewer weather stations.
The full file gives the 95% confidence range for the August 1850 figure as between +0.323 and -2.911C.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/crutem3/diagnostics/hemispheric/southern/monthly
Stop being an idiot.
Confidence range to 3 sig figs… That makes this metmess even worse!
LOL!!!!
You might as well assert you are 95% confident you have no idea what the temperature was. 😉