Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
Gleick’s Institute Admits That There Has Been No Sea Level Rise On The West Coast
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
What is the time frame for short and long term? These people are crazy.
Do we know if this Gleick himself or a minion?
And as for the short/term long term bit, who’s been shouting about a supposed acceleration in SLR since 1993.
Proper scientists tell you that such things should be looked at over 60 cycles or more.
LOL! That last tweet cracks me up! Ha!
Funny, but really there is no vertical motion on a strike slip fault. More fittingly it would be a dip-slip fault.
Typical of fear mongering at the Los Angeles Times’s (Jan 2011):
When I contacted the staff writer, he responded with:
There ya go — how our national media sources science – the NYT’s. LOL
“DPO Phases” dumb people overcome
Maybe he needs some education on PDO phase. Pacific Decadal Oscillation
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_decadal_oscillation
DPO is actually is a phase when a woman ovulates..lol
http://community.babycenter.com/post/a15678045/counting_your_dpo_luteal_phase
One has to admit it’s tempting to focus on imaginary problems than real problems in the world, as imaginary problems are usually easier to fix.
The bad thing about fixing imaginary problems is that you never know when you are successful. Fixing imaginary problems would keep you employed for a indeterminate time!
Wait a minute…
“Rising sea levels threaten US ports”.
Call Homeland Security. Those dip slips will be able to arrest them.
Must be a case of voluntary dyslexia . . as you got your h’s and t’s mixed up with l’s and p’s.
These people need to start signing legal documents that state if their predictions fail to come true on such and such a date then they forfeit all their assets and they lose their present jobs. if they are deceased then their heirs will lose everything they inherited from their lying parent.
Force them by law to have some serious skin in the game. I’ll bet the fearmongering will stop immediately.
Sea level in San Francisco is falling about 0.06 mms/year since 1980 (although it is rising at 1.4 mms/year since 1854).
GPS receivers indicate San Francisco is subsiding at 1.12 mms/year.
Actual sea level change then: between +0.29 mms/year to -1.18 mms/year [far off the +3.2 mms/year from the sea level satellites].
Maybe Gleick is in the wrong institute.
Scientists Find That Sea Level Rise Is Much Slower Than Expected…No Human Fingerprint – See more at: http://notrickszone.com/#sthash.WYSNZe1E.dpuf and http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2013/04/25/rate-of-sea-level-rise-is-controlled-by-natural-oscillations/ and many other newer papers casting Gleick contentions into doubt.