Real Climate Science

In my previous post, I showed the spectacular data tampering at GISS during the 1990’s. But it is much worse than it seems. GISS publishes a data set called Fig C which keeps the monthly temperature anomalies over a certain time window.

The animation below shows all of the overlapping months reported in the 2001 and 2015 data sets. As you can see, every single month except one has been adjusted upwards. The odds of that happening randomly are very close to zero.

2001 version : FigC.txt
Current version : Fig.C.txt

I am reminded every day by alarmists that Anthony Watts and Judith Curry have criticized my work exposing this tampering, and I would appreciate these highly respected skeptics clearly setting the record straight about what they believe is incorrect about this analysis.

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uuzmub5PXNQ]

Earlier today I showed Gavin’s spectacular data tampering before 1980, to create the lower half of the hockey stick.

1981 version : 1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf
1999 version : 1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf
Current version : Fig.B.gif (407×678)

But that is only half of the hockey stick. Some of Gavin’s finest tampering is done in the 1990’s data.

Hansen 1999 showed no net warming during the 1990’s

pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1999/1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

In 2001, the GISS website also showed no net warming during the 1990’s

NASA Goddard Institute: Surface Temperature: Graphs

But GISS now shows the 1990’s as the fastest warming decade.

They built the rest of the hockey stick by simply making up data.

This image shows how the 1990’s station data has been altered since Hansen 1999.

The animation below shows the spectacular alterations to GISS 1990’s surface between 2001 and 2015, tripling the warming during the decade.

2001 : FigA.txt
Current : Fig.A.txt

We also know that the post 2000 warming is fake, because none of the other data sets show any warming post 2000.

In summary, the entire blade of the hockey stick is a fraud, from one end to the other.

President Obama says these people are not terrorists

Great Lakes ice cover has been above normal five of the last seven years, and seven of the last thirteen years. It is already far above the normal annual maximum, with another month of growth left.

20150202180000_CVCSWCTGL_0008100042.gif (1100×850)

20150202180000_CVCHDCTGL_0008100047.gif (1100×850)

Many experts claim the exact opposite, because their career depends on lying about the climate.

In 1981, Hansen reported high temperatures at the Northern Latitudes (23.6N – 90N) around 1940, followed by a strong cooling. But that didn’t support the theory, so NASA’s finest simply made the 1940’s blip disappear through repeated data tampering.

1981 version : 1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

1999 version : 1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

Current version : Fig.B.gif (407×678)

They climategate team didn’t like the 1940’s blip, so they disappeared it.

From: Tom Wigley <[email protected]>
To: Phil Jones <[email protected]>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <[email protected]>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

Ninety degree days used to be fairly common in Minnesota, but over they almost never happen any more. The last really hot summer was 1988 – apparently Hansen’s 1988 Congressional testimony ended global warming in Minnesota

Skeptics need to stop being defensive.

A Mann-made shortage of fossil fuels would be an environmental catastrophe. Every tree in the forest would be chopped down for firewood, Every animal in the wild would be hunted to extinction for food. The air would be unbreathable from the smoke of burning wood.

Alarmists are lying about everything. They lie about the past climate. They lie about the current climate. They lie about the future climate. They lie about the potential for wind and solar. They lie about their fake climate deals with China. They lie about their motivations for blocking pipelines.

These people are the scum of the Earth, and they threaten our children’s future. Why are so called conservative politicians pandering to them?