Real Climate Science

Most of the glaciers in Antarctica were shrinking 100 years ago, during NASA’s coldest years ever.  At the time, climate experts didn’t lie about it though. They explained that the shrinking glaciers were due to the cold.

Strange to say, meteorologists argue that the diminution of ice indicates that the climate was formerly milder than now. Ice and snow only accumulate where there is occasional warmth with moisture and variations of temperature. A continuous dry cold does not favour the accumulation of ice and snow.

Papers Past — Auckland Star — 13 March 1912 — FACTS ABOUT THE POLE.

Note that according to NASA, this was occurring during the coldest years on record.

The Whole Foods Market in Columbia, MD opens tomorrow morning at 9AM, Look for the old guy on a bicycle. It is right next to the lake.

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.2107453,-76.857632,16z

Within a week, a cyclone will be spreading Arctic sea ice, and extent will flat line or increase.

Arctic sea ice area is up 55% since the same date 2012

Green shows ice gain, red shows ice loss. 

As of 1974, climate experts showed a strong temperature spike around 1940, followed by plummeting temperatures until the 1970s, with 1970 actually cooler than 1900.

Once the climate scam changed from global cooling to global warming in the late 1970s, climate experts started removing the spike. The graph below is from Hansen, 1981

Figure 2-1. Global temperature trend for (a) past century, (b) millennium, and (c) 25,000 years. (a) is based on J. Hansen, D. Johnson, A. Lacis,
S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981

Originally located at : http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/effects/downloads/Challenge_chapter2.pdf

Climate scientists later renamed the spike a “blip” and expressed their desire to get rid of it – without even knowing what caused it.

And that they did. The graph below plots current NASA global temperatures along with their 1981 version.

Fig.A.gif (656×446)

The next graph shows the hockey stick of changes to published NASA global surface temperature since 1981

The hockey stick has nothing to do with the climate, and everything to do with altering the data.

In 2005, NASA showed that Antarctica had been strongly cooling for 20 years

SVS Animation 3188 – Antarctic Heating and Cooling Trends

Gavin Schmidt (current GISS head) reported that Antarctica temperatures “decreased significantly”

Shindell and Schmidt 2004
Shindell, D.T., and G.A. Schmidt 2004. Southern Hemisphere climate response to ozone changes and greenhouse gas increases. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L18209, doi:10.1029/2004GL020724.

While most of the Earth warmed rapidly during recent decades, surface temperatures decreased significantly over most of Antarctica.

Pubs.GISS: Abstract of Shindell and Schmidt 2004

But that story wan’t going to scare anyone into giving up their money, so in 2007 they simply changed Antarctica’s history from cooling to warming.

Disintegration: Antarctic Warming Claims Another Ice Shelf : Feature Articles

Graphs which plot 15+% concentration ice show Arctic ice extent dropping precipitously, while 30+% concentration ice and ice area aren’t dropping at all.

30% ice is flat, and just below 2006.

Area is flat, and above 2006. 

The reason this is happening, is because the low concentration ice is compacting. This reduces its extent, but doesn’t affect the area, and actually increases the extent of higher concentration ice. Bottom line is that the ice isn’t melting much, and hasn’t been for about a week.

The colored maps I generate use approximately 30% concentration ice, because it is a better indication of ice melt/freeze than the 15% graphs used by NSIDC and others.

On July 4, President Obama gave permission for wind farms to kill the national bird.

Solar is just as bad, or worse

Emerging solar plants scorch birds in mid-air – The Washington Post

Environmental organizations have permitted their mindless fear about CO2, to completely corrupt their core principles.

Two years ago in June, Boulder experts predicted the demise of Penguins due to declining Antarctic Sea ice.

EMPEROR PENGUINS THREATENED BY ANTARCTIC SEA ICE LOSS

June 20, 2012
BOULDER—A decline in the population of emperor penguins appears likely this century as climate change reduces the extent of Antarctic sea ice, according to a detailed projection published this week.

The study, led by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), with co-authors from the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and other organizations, focuses on a much-observed colony of emperor penguins in Terre Adélie, Antarctica. The authors conclude that the number of breeding pairs may fall by about 80 percent by 2100.

“The projected decreases in sea ice may fundamentally alter the Antarctic environment in ways that threaten this population of penguins,” says NCAR scientist Marika Holland, a co-author of the study.

Also co-authoring the study were Christophe Barbraud and Henri Weimerskirch of the Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, in France, and Mark Serreze of the National Snow and Ice Data Center in the United States.

Emperor penguins threatened by Antarctic sea ice loss | UCAR – University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

Four months later, Boulder scientists said they predicted the record Antarctic sea ice all along.

EXPERTS: GLOBAL WARMING MEANS MORE ANTARCTIC ICE
By SETH BORENSTEIN
— Oct. 10, 2012 5:48 PM EDT

Antarctic sea ice hit a record 7.51 million square miles in September.

“A warming world can have complex and sometimes surprising consequences,” researcher Ted Maksym said this week from an Australian research vessel surrounded by Antarctic sea ice. He is with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts.

Many experts agree. Ted Scambos of the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Colorado adds: “It sounds counterintuitive, but the Antarctic is part of the warming as well.”

And on a third continent, David Vaughan of the British Antarctic Survey says that yes, what’s happening in Antarctica bears the fingerprints of man-made climate change.

Experts: Global warming means more Antarctic ice

EXPERTS: GLOBAL WARMING MEANS MORE ANTARCTIC ICE
By SETH BORENSTEIN
— Oct. 10, 2012 5:48 PM EDT

Climate change skeptics have seized on the Antarctic ice to argue that the globe isn’t warming and that scientists are ignoring the southern continent because it’s not convenient. But scientists say the skeptics are misinterpreting what’s happening and why.

Shifts in wind patterns and the giant ozone hole over the Antarctic this time of year — both related to human activity — are probably behind the increase in ice, experts say. This subtle growth in winter sea ice since scientists began measuring it in 1979 was initially surprising, they say, but makes sense the more it is studied.

“A warming world can have complex and sometimes surprising consequences,” researcher Ted Maksym said this week from an Australian research vessel surrounded by Antarctic sea ice. He is with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts.

Many experts agree. Ted Scambos of the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Colorado adds: “It sounds counterintuitive, but the Antarctic is part of the warming as well.”

Experts: Global warming means more Antarctic ice

What a pile of crap. Hansen predicted peak sea ice loss in the Antarctic

web.archive.org/…. epa.gov/climatechange/effects/downloads/Challenge_chapter2.pdf

If ice increases, it is due to global warming. If ice decreases, it is due to global warming. There has never been a group of people more completely full of it than climate experts.